Effectiveness of face masks for the population
Keywords:
Non-medical mask, Filtration, Infection, Medical face mask, Prevention, Virus, Commercial fabric/cloth mask, Homemade maskAbstract
Background. Health authorities and organizations consider non-medical face masks as an additional passive means to prevent virus diffusion. Communication strategies disseminate information among the population that such masks are essential for mitigating virus diffusion. However, scientific studies are not conclusive in showing the undisputed filtration efficiency of fabric/cloth facial masks (both commercial and homemade).
Objectives. This study examines scientific data about the effectiveness of face masks before and during the COVID-19 emergency. Present trends in the making of commercial and homemade fabric/cloth face masks are also examined.
Methods. Statistical data of published studies are analyzed and compared. Main considerations and suggestions are also extracted and discussed. Current approaches are examined for assessing the characteristics and effectiveness of fabric/cloth commercial and homemade face masks intended for the population. Results. Conflicting data exist as to whether non-medical masks have a protective effect from the spread of respiratory viruses. Both medical masks (MDs) and respiratory personal protection equipment (PPE) show a given effectiveness value.
Conclusion. Concerning commercial and homemade fabric/cloth masks, giving general indications on the choice of materials and their assemblage is difficult as it is not possible to assess the effectiveness of the filter media with respect to the kind of multiphase fluid that may be emitted upon breathing, sneezing, or coughing under different environmental conditions. This is particularly important because airflow rate, temperature, humidity, and duration of use will affect the performance of filter media. Moreover, while a mask may have excellent filter media, droplets may leak into the face-piece unless there is an adequate facial seal. In the presence of leaks, any type of mask may actually offer less protection independently of its nominal filtering effìciency.
References
1. Santarsiero A, Ciambelli P, Donsì G, et al. Face masks. Technical, technological and functional characteristics and hygienic-sanitary aspects related to the use of filtering mask in the community. Ann Ig 2020; 32(5): 472-520. doi:10.7416/ ai.2020.2371.
2. Europa. Regolamento 2017/745 del Parlamento Europeo e del Consiglio del 5 aprile 2017 relativo ai dispositivi medici, che modifica la direttiva 2001/83/CE, il Regolamento CE n. 178/2002 e il regolamento CE n. 1223/2009 e che abroga le direttive 90/385/CEE e 93/42/CEE del Consiglio. Gazzetta Ufficiale dell’Unione Europea del 5 maggio 2017, n. L 117/1.
3. Europa. Regolamento UE 2016/425 del Parlamento Europeo e del Consiglio del 9 marzo 2016 sui dispositivi di protezione individuale e che abroga la direttiva 89/686/CEE del Consiglio. Gazzetta Ufficiale dell’Unione Europea del 31 marzo 2016, n. L 81/51.
4. AFNOR. 2020. SPEC S76-001: Masque barrière. Guide d’exigence minimales, de méthode d’essais, de confection et d’usage”. Available on: https://www.snof.org/sites/default/files/ AFNORSpec-S76-001-MasquesBarrieres [Last accessed: 2020, Sep 11].
5. World Health Organization (WHO). Advice on the use of masks in the context of COVID-19. Interim guidance. 5 June 2020. Available on: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/332293 [Last accessed: 2020, Sep 11].
6. Jefferson T, Foxlee R, Del Mar C, et al. Physical Interventions to Interrupt or Reduce the Spread of Respiratory Viruses: Systematic Review. BMJ 2008; 336: 77-80. doi: 10.1136/ bmj.39393.510347.BE.
7. van der Sande M, Teunis P, Sabel R. Professional and Home-Made Face Masks Reduce Exposure to Respiratory Infections Among the General Population. PLoS One 2008; 3(7): e2618. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002618.
8. Cowling BJ, Chan KH, Fang VJ, et al. Facemasks and Hand Hygiene to Prevent Influenza Transmission in Households: A Cluster Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151(7): 437-46. doi:
10.7326/0003-4819-151-7-200910060-00142.
9. MacIntyre CR, Cauchemez S, Dwyer DE, et al. Face mask use and control of respiratory virus transmission in households. Emerg Infect Dis 2009; 15(2): 233-41. doi: 10.3201/ eid1502.081167 PMID: 19193267.
10. Aiello AE, Murray GF, Perez P, et al. Mask Use, Hand Hygiene, and Seasonal Influenza-Like Illness Among Young Adults: A Randomized Intervention Trial. J Infect Dis 2010 15; 201(4): 491-8. doi: 10.1086/650396.
11. Rengasamy S, Eimer B, Shaffer RE. Simple Respiratory Protection--Evaluation of the Filtration Performance of Cloth Masks and Common Fabric Materials Against 20-1000 Nm Size Particles. Ann Occup Hyg 2010; 54(7): 789-98. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meq044.
12. Davies A, Thompson KA, Giri K, Kafatos G, Walker J, Bennett A. Testing the Efficacy of Homemade Masks: Would They Protect in an Influenza Pandemic? Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2013; 7(4): 413-8. doi: 10.1017/ dmp.2013.43.
13. Chu DK, Akl EA, Duda S, Solo K, Yaacoub S, Schünemann HJ on behalf of the COVID-19 Systematic Urgent Review Group Effort (SURGE) study authors. Physical Distancing, Face Masks, and Eye Protection to Prevent Person-To-Person Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2020; 395(10242): 1973-87. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31142-9. [Last accessed: 2020, Sep 10].
14. Xiao J, Shiu E, Gao H, et al. Nonpharmaceutical Measures for Pandemic Influenza in Nonhealthcare Settings—Personal Protective and Environmental Measures. Emerg Infect Dis 2020; 26(5): 967-75. doi: 10.3201/eid2605.190994.
15. Brainard J, Jones N, Lake I, Hooper L, Hunter PR. Facemasks and similar barriers to prevent respiratory illness such as COVID-19: A rapid systematic review. Preprint, 2020. Available on: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020 .04.01.20049528v1. https://doi.org/10.1101/202 0.04.01.20049528.
16. Eikenberry SE, Mancuso M, Iboi E, et al. To mask or not to mask: Modeling the potential for face mask use by the general public to curtail the COVID-19 pandemic. Infect Dis Model 2020; 5: 293-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
idm.2020.04.001
17. Jefferson T, Jones MA, Al-Ansary L, et al. Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce
the spread of respiratory viruses. Part 1 - Face masks, eye protection and person distancing: systematic review and meta-analysis. medRxiv 2020.03.30.20047217. doi: https://doi.org/10.1 101/2020.03.30.20047217.
18. Liang M, Gao L, Cheng C, et al. Efficacy of face mask in preventing respiratory virus transmission: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Travel Med Infect Dis 2020; 36: 101751. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101751. Epub 2020 May 28.
19. Leung NHL, Chu DKW, Shiu EYC, et al. Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efficacy of face masks. Nat Med 2020; 26(5): 676-80. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0843-2. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
20. Long Y, Hu T, Liu L, et al. Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks against influenza: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Evid Based Med 2020; 13(2): 93-101. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12381. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
21. Ma Q-X, Shan H, Zhang H-L, Li G-M, Yang R-M, Chen J-M. Potential utilities of mask wearing and instant hand hygiene for fighting SARS-CoV-2. J Med Virol 2020 Mar 31; 0.1002/jmv.25805. https://doi.org/10.1002/ jmv.25805.
22. Guyton HG, Decker HM, Anton GT. Emergency respiratory protection against radiological and biological aerosols. AMA Arch Ind Health 1959; 20(2): 91-5.
23. Cooper DW, Hinds WC, Price JM. Emergency respiratory protection with common materials. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1983; 44(1): 1-6.
24. Huang SH, Chen CW, Kuo Y-M, Lai C-Y, McKay R, Chen CC. Factors Affecting Filter Penetration and Quality Factor of Particulate Respirators. Aerosol Air Qual Res 2013; 13(1): 162-171.
https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2012.07.0179.
25. Benson K, Hartz AJ. A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1878-86. doi: 10.1056/ NEJM200006223422506.
26. Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med 2000; 342(25): 1887-92. doi: 10.1056/ NEJM200006223422507.
27. Vandenbroucke JP. Observational research, randomised trials, and two views of medical science. Version 2. PLoS Med 2008; 5(3): e67. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050067.
28. Da Zhou C, Sivathondan P, Handa A. Unmasking the surgeons: the evidence base behind the use of facemasks in surgery. J R Soc Med 2015; 108(6): 223-8. doi: 10.1177/0141076815583167.
29. Radonovich LJ Jr, Simberkoff MS, Bessesen MT, et al. N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2019; 322(9): 824-33. doi: 10.1001/ jama.2019.11645.
30. Offeddu V, Yung CF, Low MSF, Tam CC. Effectiveness of Masks and Respirators Against Respiratory Infections in Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2017; 65(11): 1934-42. doi: 10.1093/ cid/cix681.
31. Lee SA, Hwang DC, Li HY, Tsai CF, Chen CW, Chen JK. Particle Size-Selective Assessment of Protection of European Standard FFP Respirators and Surgical Masks against Particles-Tested with Human Subjects. J Healthc Eng Open 2016. ID 8572493. doi: 10.1155/2016/8572493.
32. Chan KH, Yuen KY. COVID-19 epidemic: disentangling the re-emerging controversy about medical facemasks from an epidemiological perspective. Int J Epidemiol 2020; 1-4. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa044.
33. MacIntyre CR, Seale H, Dung TC, et al. A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers. BMJ Open 2015; 22; 5: e006577. doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2014-006577
34. MacIntyre CR, Chughtai AA. A rapid systematic review of the efficacy of face masks and respirators against coronaviruses and other respiratory transmissible viruses for the community, healthcare workers and sick patients. Int J Nurs Stud 2020; 108: 103629. doi.org/10.1016/j. ijnurstu.2020.103629.
35. Aiello AE, Perez V, Coulborn RM, Davis BM, Uddin M, Monto AS. Facemasks, hand hygiene, and influenza among young adults: a randomized intervention trial. PLoS One 2012; 7(1): e29744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029744.
36. Larson EL, Ferng YH, Wong-McLoughlin J, Wang S, Haber M, Morse SS. Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on URIs and influenza in crowded, urban households. Public Health Rep 2010; 125(2): 178-91. doi: 10.1177/003335491012500206.
37. Cowling BJ, Fung RO, Cheng CK, et al. Preliminary findings of a randomized trial of non-pharmaceutical interventions to prevent influenza transmission in households. PLoS One 2008; 3(5): e2101. doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0002101.
38. Suess T, Remschmidt C, Schink SB, et al. The role of facemasks and hand hygiene in the prevention of influenza transmission in households: results from a cluster randomised trial; Berlin, Germany, 2009-2011. BMC Infectious Diseases 2012; 12: 26. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-26.
39. Simmerman JM, Suntarattiwong P, Levy J, et al. Findings from a household randomized controlled trial of hand washing and face masks to reduce influenza transmission in Bangkok, Thailand. Influenza Other Respir Viruses
2011; 5(4): 256-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-2659 .2011.00205.x.
40. Ho KF, Lin LY, Weng SP, Chuang KJ. Medical mask versus cotton mask for preventing respiratory droplet transmission in micro environments. Sci Total Environ 2020; 735: 139510. doi:
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139510.
41. Bourouiba L. Turbulent Gas Clouds and Respiratory Pathogen Emissions: Potential Implications for Reducing Transmission of COVID-19. Epub 2020 March 26. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.4756.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Transfer of Copyright and Permission to Reproduce Parts of Published Papers.
Authors retain the copyright for their published work. No formal permission will be required to reproduce parts (tables or illustrations) of published papers, provided the source is quoted appropriately and reproduction has no commercial intent. Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.