Homecare workers in Italy: a narrative review

Homecare workers in Italy: a narrative review

Authors

  • S. Simeone
  • E. Vellone
  • G. Pucciarelli
  • R. Alvaro

Keywords:

Homecare, workers, Italy, review

Abstract

Introduction. The progressive ageing and ever-increasing life expectancy of the world’s population are accompanied by an increase in chronic pathologies. Italy continues to be the nation with the highest percentage of senior citizens. Recent economic crises and movements of social change have led to a gradual increase in the use of homecare workers for the territorial and family management of chronic illnesses. Contrary to what has happened in other countries, in Italy an informal logic has prevailed regarding the recruitment and the employment of homecare workers, hindering the evolution of this sector.

Aim. This narrative review focuses on the role of homecare workers, as it appears in Italian researches.

Methods. A narrative review was conducted using the following electronic databases: CINAHL Complete, MEDLINE, MEDLINE Complete, PsycINFO, and SocINDEX. Only studies conducted in the past 20 years with an Italian Homecare Worker (HCW) target population were considered. Data were extracted from each manuscript to allow for quick comparisons of information, such as research objectives, study methodologies, data collection tools, and relative results. Two reviewers independently extracted the following data for each study: region, setting context, participant characteristics, group description and sample, outcomes measured, and a description of the main results.

Results. From the analysis of heterogeneous Italian literature, the importance of homecare workers is clear. Their work not only influences assisted individuals but also informal caregivers and the direct costs of the Italian national health system.

Conclusion. Homecare workers are important in Italian society. The little attention that the scientific literature has paid to this population may be due to the difficulty of finding subjects with a legal status and, therefore, who are willing to participate in specific investigations. Investigating the dyad of care and extending these investigations to the surrounding family context, seem to be the major priorities that should be explored by future research.

References

1. United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) HelpAge International. Aging in the 21st century: A celebration and challenge. New York: UNFPA and London: HelpAge International, 2012. Available on: https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/Ageing%20report.pdf [Last accessed: 2020, Apr 6].

2. Illario M, De Luca V, Tramontano G, et al. The Italian reference sites of the European innovation partnership on active and healthy ageing: Progetto Mattone Internazionale as an enabling factor. Ann Ist Super Sanita 2017; 53(1): 60-9. doi: 10.4415/ann_17_01_12.

3. Robine JM, Michel JP, Herrmann FR. Who will care for the oldest people in our ageing society?

BMJ 2007; 334(7593): 570-1. doi: 10.1136/ bmj.39129.397373.BE.

4. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Health at a Glance: Europe 2010. OECD, 2010. Available on: https:// www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/health_glance2010-en.pdf?expires=1582322799&id=id&ac cname=guest&checksum=E4DC81FA558CB1 71C9200874AD708E55 [Last accessed: 2020, Apr 6].

5. Pickard L. Substitution between formal and informal care: a ‘natural experiment’in social policy in Britain between 1985 and 2000. Ageing Soc 2012; 32(7): 1147-75.

6. Nuti S, Daraio C, Speroni C, Vainieri M. Relationships between technical efficiency and the quality and costs of health care in Italy. Int J Qual Health Care 2011; 23(3): 324-30. doi: 10.1093/ intqhc/mzr005.

7. Grabowski DC. The cost-effectiveness of noninstitutional long-term care services: review and synthesis of the most recent evidence. Med Care Res Rev 2006; 63(1): 3-28. doi: 10.1177/1077558705283120.

8. Genet N, Boerma WG, Kringos DS, et al. Home care in Europe: a systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv Res 2011; 11: 207. doi:

10.1186/1472-6963-11-207.

9. Lyons KS, Vellone E, Lee CS, et al. A Dyadic Approach to Managing Heart Failure With Confidence. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2015; 30(4 Suppl 1): S6471. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000234.

10. Pucciarelli G, Ausili D, Galbussera AA, et al. Quality of life, anxiety, depression and burden among stroke caregivers: A longitudinal, observational multicentre study. J Adv Nurs 2018; doi:

10.1111/jan.13695.

11. Kerr SM, Smith LN.. Stroke: an exploration of the experience of informal caregiving. Clin Rehabil 2001; 15(4): 428-36. doi: 10.1191/026921501678310234.

12, Bilotta C, Vergani C.. Quality of private personal care for elderly people with a disability living at home: correlates and potential outcomes. Health Soc Care Community 2008; 16(4): 354-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2007.00746.x.

13. Hanson GC, Perrin NA, Moss H, Laharnar N, Glass N. Workplace violence against homecare workers and its relationship with workers health outcomes: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2015; 15: 11. doi: 10.1186/s12889-0141340-7.

14. Nakaishi L, Moss H, Weinstein M, et al. Exploring workplace violence among home care workers in a consumer-driven home health care program. Workplace Health Saf 2013; 61(10): 441-50. doi: 10.3928/21650799-201309161710.1177/216507991306101004.

15. Lombardia, FNP CISL. Fuori dall’ombra. Indagine sui servizi di assistenza per gli anziani in Lombardia. Roma: Edizioni Lavoro, 2006.

16. Olson R, Hess JA, Parker KN, et al. From Research-to-Practice: An Adaptation and Dissemination of the COMPASS Program for

Home Care Workers. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018; 15(12). pii: E2777. doi: 10.3390/ ijerph15122777.

17, Fethke CC, Smith IM, Johnson N. “Risk” factors affecting readmission of the elderly into the health care system. Med Care 1986; 24(5): 429-37.

18. Garcia-Perez L, Linertova R, Lorenzo-Riera A,

Vazquez-Diaz JR, Duque-Gonzalez B, SarriaSantamera A. Risk factors for hospital readmissions in elderly patients: a systematic review. QJM 2011; 104(8): 639-51. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/ hcr070.

19. Bilotta C, Nicolini P, Vergani C. Quality of private personal care for elderly people in Italy living at home with disabilities: risk of nursing home placement at a 1-year follow-up. Health Soc Care Community 2009; 17(6): 543-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2009.00853.x.

20. Giorgi Rossi P, Beccaro M, Miccinesi G, et al. Dying of cancer in Italy: impact on family and caregiver. The Italian Survey of Dying of Cancer. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007; 61(6): 547-54. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.045138.

21, Scalmana S, Di Napoli A, Franco F, et al; Working Group for Dementia of Lazio Region. Use of health and social care services in a cohort of Italian dementia patients. Funct Neurol 2013; 28(4): 265-73. doi: 10.11138/ FNeur/2013.28.4.265.

22, Chiatti C, Di Rosa M, Melchiorre MG, Manzoli L, Rimland JM, Lamura G. Migrant care workers as protective factor against caregiver burden: results from a longitudinal analysis of the EUROFAMCARE study in Italy. Aging Ment Health 2013; 17(5): 609-14. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2013.765830.

23, Iniziative e studi sulla multietnicità (Ismu), Censis-Fondazione. Elaborazione di un modello previsionale del fabbisogno di servizi assistenziali alla persona nel mercato del lavoro italiano con particolare riferimento al contributo della popolazione straniera. Final Report. Roma: Ministero del Lavoro e delle Politiche Sociali, 2012. Available on: https://www.agenziaiura.it/ allegati/documenti/168/Sintesi_2013.pdf [Last accessed: 2020, Apr 6].

24. Chiatti C, Rodriguez Gatta D, Malmgren Fange

A, Scandali VM, Masera F, Lethin C; UPTECH AND TECH@HOME Research Groups. Utilization of Formal and Informal Care by Community-Living People with Dementia: A Comparative Study between Sweden and Italy. Int J Environ Health Public Health 2018; 15(12).

pii: E2679. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122679.

25. Istituto Nazionale di Previdenza Sociale (INPS). Statistiche in Breve. A cura del Coordinamento Generale Statistico Attuariale, 2019. Available on: https://www.inps.it/banchedatistatistiche/ menu/domestici/StatInBreve.pdf [Last accessed: 2020, Apr 6].

26. Bonatti V, Muniandy P. Defiant aspirations: Migrant women’s struggles for stability and upward mobility in Naples and Kuala Lumpur. Migr Stud 2018. doi: 10.1093/migration/mny039.

27. Carretero S, Stewart J, Centeno C. Information and communication technologies for informal carers and paid assistants: benefits from micro-, meso-, and macro-levels. Eur J Ageing 2015; 12(2): 163-73. doi: 10.1007/s10433-0150333-4.

28. Kordasiewicz A. Role-Identity Dynamics in Care and Household Work: Strategies of Polish Workers in Naples, Italy. Qual Soc Rev 2014; 10(4): 88-114.

29. Fusco S, Corsonello A, Chiatti C, et al. Migrant care workers and rehospitalization among older patients discharged from acute care hospitals. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2015; 15(2): 196-203. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12254.

30. Tomai M, Pezzuti L, Mebane M, Benedetti M, Moro A. The Impact Of Dispositional Variables Of Elders, Relatives, And Paid Caregivers On Elders’ Empowerment And Life Satisfaction. Exp Aging Res2017; 43(4): 367-78. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2017.1333833.

31, Bilotta C, Nicolini P, Vergani C. One-year predictors of turnover among personal-care workers for older adults living at home in Italy. Ageing Soc 2011; 31(4): 611-24. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X10001194.

32. Lamura G, Mnich E, Nolan M, et al; EUROFAMCARE Group. Family carers’ experiences using support services in Europe: empirical evidence from the EUROFAMCARE study.

Gerontologist 2008; 48(6): 752-71. doi: 10.1093/ geront/48.6.752.

33. Da Roit B, Naldini M. Should I stay or should I go? Combining work and care for an older parent in Italy. South Eur Soc Polit 2010; 15(04): 53151. doi: 10.1080/13608746.2010.490653.

34. Gori C. Solidarity in Italy’s policies towards the frail elderly: a value at stake. Int J Soc Welf 2000; 9(4): 261-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/14682397.00138.

35. Ostbye T, Malhotra R, Malhotra C, Arambepola C, Chan A. Does support from foreign domestic workers decrease the negative impact of informal caregiving? Results from Singapore survey on informal caregiving. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2013; 68(4): 609-21. doi: 10.1093/ geronb/gbt04210.11138/FNeur/2013.28.4.265.

36. Fleming G, Taylor BJ. Battle on the home care front: perceptions of home care workers of factors influencing staff retention in Northern Ireland. Health Soc Care Community 2007; 15(1): 67-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524 .2006.00666.x.

37. Jorgensen D, Parsons M, Reid MG, Weidenbohm K, Parsons J, Jacobs S. The providers’ profile of the disability support workforce in New Zealand. Health Soc Care Community 2009; 17(4): 396405. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2008.00839.x.

38. Lindquist LA, Jain N, Tam K, Martin GJ, Baker DW.. Inadequate health literacy among paid caregivers of seniors. J Gen Intern Med 2011; 26(5): 474-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1596210.3390/ijerph15122777.

39. Carpenter GI. Aging in the United Kingdom and Europe--a snapshot of the future? J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53(9 Suppl): S310-13. doi:

10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53497.x.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-04

Issue

Section

Original research

How to Cite

1.
Simeone S, Vellone E, Pucciarelli G, Alvaro R. Homecare workers in Italy: a narrative review. Ann Ig. 2025;33(2):163-176. doi:10.7416/ai.2021.2422