Effectiveness of the school nurse role in increasing the vaccination coverage rate: a narrative review
Keywords:
School nurse, immunization, coverage rateAbstract
Introduction. Vaccinations are recognized as the best primary prevention strategy to counteract infectious diseases. However, in recent years, there has been a decrease in the immunization rate, particularly among children and teenagers. Several strategies have been tested to circumvent the issue. Among them, there was the re-introduction of vaccination practices in schools.
The literature shows that introducing immunization projects in schools has increased vaccination rates in children and teenagers, but the role of the school nurse in these settings has never been evaluated. AIM. To determine whether the role of the school nurse, within the school vaccination projects, does have a positive impact on the rate of immunization’s compliance.
Methods. Narrative review. Studies of primary, secondary and gray literature were included, researched on Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Science Citation Index and Web of Science. Nine articles based on studies conducted in different educational institutions (from kindergarten to high school) were included in the review.
Results. All the articles included in the review showed that the interventions conducted by the school nurse, aimed at increasing the rate of adhesion to vaccinations, are effective.
Discussion and Conclusions. The literature related to the topic of the present study shows that the school nurse plays a key role in increasing the rate of adhesion to immunization for school-age children / adolescents. The figure of the school nurse plays a crucial role in increasing the rate of adhesion to immunization’s programme for school-age children. However, in several countries, including Italy, this figure was present in the past but does not exist now. The lack of the school nurse’s role in these countries does not allow the activation of programs focused on this figure’s capacity.
References
1. Rosen BL, Ashwood D, Richardson GB. School Nurses’ Professional Practice in the HPV Vaccine Decision-Making Process. J Sch Nurs 2016; 32(2): 138-48.
2. Grace JA. Adolescent immunization: challenges and opportunities. J Sch Nurs 2006; 22(2): 8793.
3. Mackroth MS, Irwin K, Vandelaer J, Hombach J, Eckert LO. Immunizing school-age children and adolescents: experience from low- and middle-income countries. Vaccine 2010; 28(5): 1138-47.
4. Caskey RN, Macario E, Johnson DC, Hamlish T, Alexander KA. A school-located vaccination adolescent pilot initiative in Chicago: lessons learned. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2013; 2(3):
198-204.
5. Paul P, Fabio A. Literature review of HPV vaccine delivery strategies: considerations for school- and non-school based immunization program. Vaccine 2014; 32(3): 320-6.
6. Perman S, Turner S, Ramsay AIG, Baim-Lance A, Utley M, Fulop NJ. School-based vaccination programmes: A systematic review of the evidence on organisation and delivery in high income countries. BMC Public Health 2017; 17(1): 252.
7. Vandelaer J Olaniran M. Using a school-based approach to deliver immunization-global update. Vaccine 2015; 33(5): 719-25.
8. Kang GJ, Culp RK, Abbas KM. Facilitators and barriers of parental attitudes and beliefs toward school-located influenza vaccination in the United States: Systematic review. Vaccine 2017; 35(16): 1987-95.
9. Vercruysse J, Chigurupati NL, Fung L, Apte G, Pierre-Joseph N, Perkins RB. Parents’ and providers’ attitudes toward school-located provision and school-entry requirements for HPV vaccines. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2017; 12(6): 1606-14.
10. Houlahan B. Origins of School Nursing. J Sch Nurs 2018; 34(3): 203-10.
11. Rosen BL, DiClemente R, Shepard AL, Wilson KL, Fehr SK. Factors associated with school nurses’ HPV vaccine attitudes for school-aged youth. Psychol Health Med 2017; 22(5): 53545.
12. National association of School Nurses (NASN). NASN position statement: immunizations. NASN Sch Nurse 2011; 26(2): 121-2.
13. Vernon TM, Conner JS, Shaw BS, Lampe JM, Doster ME. An evaluation of three techniques improving immunization levels in elementary schools. Am J Public Health 1976; 66(5): 45760.
14. Ferson MJ, Fitzsimmons G, Christie D, Woollett H. School health nurse interventions to increase immunisation uptake in school entrants. Public Health 1995; 109(1): 25-9.
15. Boyer-Chuanroong L, Deaver P. Meeting the preteen vaccine law: a pilot program in urban middle schools. J Sch Health 2000; 70(2): 3944.
16. Toole K, Perry CS. Increasing immunization compliance. J Sch Nurs 2004; 20(4): 203-8.
17. Luthy KE, Thorpe A, Dymock LC, Connely S. Evaluation of an Intervention Program to Increase Immunization Compliance Among School Children. J Sch Nurs 2011; 27(4): 252-7.
18. Vanderpool RC, Breheny PJ, Tiller PA, et al. Implementation and Evaluation of a School-Based Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Program in Rural Kentucky. Am J Prev Med 2015; 49(2): 317-23.
19. Davis WS, Varni SE, Barry SE, Frankowski BL. Harder VS. Increasing Immunization Compliance by Reducing Provisional Admittance. J Sch Nurs 2016; 32(4): 246-57.
20. Swallow W, Roberts JC. An Evidence-Based Project Demonstrating Increased School Immunization Compliance Following a School Nurse–Initiated Vaccine Compliance Strategy. J Sch Nurs 2016; 32(6): 385-9.
21. Grandahl M, Rosenblad A, Stenhammar C, et al. School-based intervention for the prevention of HPV among adolescents: a cluster randomised controlled study. BMJ Open 2016; 6: e009875. 22. Signorelli C, Odone A, Cella P, Iannazzo S. Childhood vaccine coverage in Italy after the new law on mandatory immunization. Ann Ig 2018; 30(4 Suppl 1): 1-10.
23. Haire B, Komesaroff P, Leontini R, Raina MacIntyre C. Raising Rates of Childhood Vaccination: The Trade-off Between Coercion and Trust. J
24. Odone A, Ferrari A, Spagnoli F, et al. Effectiveness of interventions that apply new media to improve vaccine uptake and vaccine coverage. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2015; 11(1): 72-82.
25. Opel DJ, Taylor JA, Mangione-Smith R, et al. Validity and reliability of a survey to identify vaccine-hesitant parents. Vaccine 2001; 29(38): 6598-605.
26. Tran BX, Nguyen QN, Dang AK, et al. Accettability of and willingness to pay for using a smartphone-based vaccination application in Vietnamese cohort. Patient Prefer Adherence 2018; 12: 2583-91.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Transfer of Copyright and Permission to Reproduce Parts of Published Papers.
Authors retain the copyright for their published work. No formal permission will be required to reproduce parts (tables or illustrations) of published papers, provided the source is quoted appropriately and reproduction has no commercial intent. Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.