Trust of Italian healthcare professionals in covId-19 (anti-sars-cov-2) vaccination
Keywords:
Vaccine hesitancy, healthcare professionals, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, vaccine, vaccine confidenceAbstract
Background. Vaccination is one of the most effective tools available to Public Health. Its potential usefulness is threatened by the rise of vaccine hesitancy among the general population, which has grown as much as to prompt the World Health Organization to express its concerns on the matter. The risk posed by vaccine hesitancy is even more concerning in the light of the efforts to curb the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, which focus mainly on mass vaccination campaigns. This holds especially true when applied to healthcare professionals, among whom vaccine hesitancy can be particularly detrimental. For these reasons, our study focuses on potential determinants of vaccine hesitancy among healthcare professionals.
Study design. The study is a cross-sectional study.
Methods. Data were collected from January 1st to February 16th, by means of a self-administered online questionnaire in a cohort of Italian healthcare professionals.
Results. Overall, 10,898 questionnaires were collected. Among the respondents, 1.1% expressed vaccine hesitancy. Hesitancy was less frequent in professionals involved in Primary Care and in the Clinical Sciences/Public Health group. Among clinicians, paediatricians, oncologists, and geriatrists showed especially accepting attitudes towards vaccination. Lower hesitancy rates were also registered among the respondents who already had received influenza vaccination and who never had any adverse effects following vaccination. Higher hesitancy rates were observed among individuals who had family members aged >65 years and with a history of severe adverse reactions to vaccination.
Conclusion. Vaccine hesitancy rates were extremely low among participants in our study. Some medical specialties shown were particularly accepting towards vaccination. The potential predictors and protective factors pointed out by our analysis might allow more refined targets
References
1. Andre FE, Booy R, Bock HL, et al. Vaccination greatly reduces disease, disability, death and inequity worldwide. Bull World Health Organ. 2008 Sep; 86(2): 140-6. doi: 10.2471/blt.07.040089.
2. Callender D. Vaccine hesitancy: More than a movement. Hum Vaccines Immunother. 2016 Sep; 12(9): 2464-8. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2016.1178434. Epub 2016 May 9.
3. World Health Organization (WHO). Top ten threats to global health in 2019. Available on: https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/tenthreats-to-global-health-in-2019 [Last accessed: 2021 Apr 4].
4. World Health Organization (WHO). Report of the SAGE working group on vaccine hesitancy. 2014. Available on: https://www.who.int/immunization/sage/meetings/2014/october/1_Report_ WORKING_GROUP_vaccine_hesitancy_final. pdf [Last accessed: 2021 Apr 4].
5. European Center for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Vaccine hesitancy among healthcare workers and their patients in Europe. ECDC Technical Report. 2015. Available on: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/ vaccine-hesitancy-among-healthcare-workersand-their-patients-europe [Last accessed: 2021 Apr 4].
6. Britton T, Ball F, Trapman P. A mathematical model reveals the influence of population heterogeneity on herd immunity to SARS-CoV-2. Science. 2020 Aug; 369(6505): 846-9. doi:
10.1126/science.abc6810. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
7. Billah MA, Miah MM, Khan MN. Reproductive number of coronavirus: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on global level evidence. PLoS One. 2020 Nov 11; 15(11): e0242128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0242128.
8. Sallam M. COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Worldwide: A Concise Systematic Review of Vaccine Acceptance Rates. Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Feb 16; 9(2): 160. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9020160.
9. Barello S, Nania T, Dellafiore F, Graffigna G, Caruso R. “Vaccine hesitancy” among university students in Italy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Aug; 35(8):781-3. doi: 10.1007/s10654-020-00670-z. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
10. Nzaji MK, Ngombe LK, Mwamba GN, et al. Acceptability of Vaccination Against COVID-19 Among Healthcare Workers in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Pragmat Obs Res.
2020 Oct; 29(11): 103-9. doi: 10.2147/POR. S271096.
11. Grech V, Gauci C, Agius S. Vaccine hesitancy among Maltese healthcare workers toward influenza and novel COVID-19 vaccination. Early Hum Dev. 2020 Oct 1: 105213. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105213.
12. Detoc M, Bruel S, Frappe P, Tardy B, Botelhonevers E. Intention to participate in a COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial and to get vaccinated against COVID-19 in France during the pandemic. Vaccine. 2020 Oct 21; 38(45): 7002-6. doi: 10.1016/j.
vaccine.2020.09.041. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
13. Costantino C, Ledda C, Squeri R, et al.E. Attitudes and Perception of Healthcare Workers Concerning Influenza Vaccination during the 2019/2020 Season: A Survey of Sicilian University Hospitals. Vaccines (Basel). 2020 Nov 16; 8(4): 686. doi: 10.3390/vaccines8040686.
14. Lee MJ, Cho J. Promoting HPV Vaccination Online: Message Design and Media Choice. Health Promot Pract. 2017 Sep; 18(5): 645-53. doi: 10.1177/1524839916688229. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
15. Puri N, Coomes EA, Haghbayan H, Gunaratne K. Social media and vaccine hesitancy : new updates for the era of COVID-19 and globalized infectious diseases. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020 Nov 1; 16(11): 2586-93. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1780846. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
16 ISTAT. Famiglie che non riescono a risparmiare o a far fronte a spese impreviste: numero di minori e anziani in famiglia. Indagine sulle condizioni di vita (EU-SILC). 2019. Available on: http:// dati.istat.it/Index.aspx?QueryId=24680# [Last accessed 2021 Apr 4].
17. Malik AA, McFadden SAM, Elharake J, Omer SB. Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in the US. EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Sep; 26: 100495. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100495. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
18. Verger P, Dubé E. Restoring confidence in vaccines in the COVID-19 era. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2020 Nov; 19(11): 991-3. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2020.1825945. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Transfer of Copyright and Permission to Reproduce Parts of Published Papers.
Authors retain the copyright for their published work. No formal permission will be required to reproduce parts (tables or illustrations) of published papers, provided the source is quoted appropriately and reproduction has no commercial intent. Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.