Literacy in the time of Coronavirus: an Italian perspective: Value of literacy in the context of a pandemic
Keywords:
Health Literacy, COVID-19, Asset, Infodemic, Empowerment, Social CohesionAbstract
Background. COVID-19 pandemic, with its dramatic impact on society, poses a challenge to Health Promotion and to its principles of empowerment, social cohesion and citizens’ democratic participation in health policies. In this pressing emergency, public health strategies aimed at preventing the spread of the pandemic have been primarily oriented towards restrictive measures (travel restrictions, use of PPE) in absence of an adequate educational communication, aimed at increasing citizens’ knowledge and skills in regard to the emergency context.
Aim. To offer a perspective on the Italian situation, in terms of health literacy and life skills in the context of COVID-19 pandemic, aimed not only at identifying deficits, but particularly at determining opportunities and resources (assets) – offered by the peculiar context of crisis – useful to provide citizens with the necessary tools to comprehend the criticalities linked with the emergency and to shape their behaviour to new requirements, in absence of external obligations, as well as to promote future participation of the population – both effective and informed – in a social and political context.
Methods. A non-systematic review of literature on the subject of health literacy and social cohesion in emergency contexts has been supported by a qualitative assessment, based on the model of assets and on the Italian condition in the last trimester of 2020.
Results. The scarce ability of the population to independently adequate habits and behaviour to new criticalities required by the risk of infection – as well as the necessity to suspend their empowerment and capability from government authorities to protect public health – has been firstly traced back to a widespread lack of literacy and life skills at a general population level. The current situation of crisis offers a peculiar opportunity of tools, circumstances and receptiveness to highlight such deficits, as well as an intervention on multiple fronts, in order to increase literacy and capability, both on an individual and on a community level, through inclusive and sustainable initiatives.
Conclusion. A prevention strategy based on the critical understanding of risk and risk-related criticalities is the only one which can aspire to last over time, while offering an effective tool for the safeguarding of public health, along with an opportunity of being prepared to contrast future emergencies more effectively. The development of such strategies represents one of the most significant contributions Health Promotion can offer in the time of Coronavirus.
References
1. World Health Organization (WHO). Ottawa charter for health promotion. 1986. Available on: https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/ pdf_file/0004/129532/Ottawa_Charter.pdf [Last accessed: 2021 Feb 21].
2. World Health Organization (WHO). Jakarta declaration on leading health promotion into the 21st century. 1997. Available on: https://www.who.int/ healthpromotion/conferences/previous/jakarta/ declaration/en/ [Last accessed: 2021 Feb 21].
3. Owens S, Rayner T, Bina O. New agendas for appraisal: reflections on theory, practice and research. Environ Plan A. 2004; 36(11): 1943-59. doi: 10.1068/a36281.
4. Adelle C, Jordan A, Turnpenny J. Proceeding in parallel or drifting apart? A systematic review of policy appraisal research and practices. Environ Plann C. 2012; 30(3): 401-15. doi:10.1068/ c11104.
5. Weiss CH. The many meanings of research utilization. Public Adm Rev 1979; 39(5): 426-31. doi:10.2307/3109916.
6. Parsons W. From muddling through to muddling up: evidence-based policy making and the modernisation of British Government. Public Policy Adm. 2002; 17(3): 43-60. doi:10.1177/095207670201700304.
7. Abel T, McQueen D. Critical health literacy and the COVID-19 crisis. Health Promot Int. 2020; 35(6):1612-3. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaa040.
8. Saboga-Nunes L, Levin-Zamir D, Bittlingmayer
U, et al. A Health Promotion Focus on COVID19: Keep the Trojan horse out of our health systems. Promote health for ALL in times of crisis and beyond! EUPHA-HP, IUHPE, UNESCO
Chair Global Health & Education, 2020. Available on: https://www.iuhpe.org/images/IUHPE/ Advocacy/COVID19_HealthPromotion.pdf
[Last accessed: 2021 Feb 21].
9. Nutbeam D. Health literacy as a public goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promot Int. 2000; 15(3): 259-67. 10.1093/heapro/15.3.259.
10. Capecchi L, Guazzini A, Lorini C, Santomauro F, Bonaccorsi G. The first Italian validation of the most widespread health literacy assessment tool: The Newest Vital Sign. Epidemiol Prev. 2015; 39(4 Suppl 1): 124-8.
11. Lorini C, Santomauro F, Grazzini M, et al. Health literacy in Italy: a cross-sectional study protocol to assess the health literacy level in a populationbased sample, and to validate health literacy measures in the Italian language. BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 14; 7(11): e017812. doi: 10.1136/ bmjopen-2017-017812.
12. Bonaccorsi G, Grazzini M, Pieri P, Santomauro F, Ciancio M, Lorini C. Assessment of Health Literacy and validation of single-item literacy screener (SILS) in a sample of Italian people,
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2017; 53(3): 205-12. doi:
10.4415/ANN_17_03_05.
13. Lorini C, Lastrucci V, Mantwill, Vettori V, Bonaccorsi G; Florence Health Literacy Research Group. Measuring health literacy in Italy: the validation study of the HLS-EU-Q16 and of the HLS-EU-Q6 in Italian language. Ann Ist Super
Sanita. 2019 Jan-Mar; 55(1): 10-8. doi: 10.4415/
ANN_19_01_04.
14. Lorini C, Lastrucci V, Paolini D, Bonaccorsi G; Florence Health Literacy Research Group. Measuring health literacy combining performance-based and self-assessed measures: the roles of age, educational level and financial resources in predicting health literacy skills. A crosssectional study conducted in Florence (Italy). BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 5; 10(10): e035987. doi:
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035987.
15. Sørensen K, Pelikan JM, Röthlin F, et al. Health literacy in Europe: comparative results of the European health literacy survey (HLS-EU). Eur J Public Health. 2015; 25(6): 1053-8. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv043. Epub 2015 Apr 5.
16. Palumbo R, Annarumma C, Adinolfi P, Musella M, Piscopo G. The Italian Health Literacy Project: Insights from the assessment of health literacy skills in Italy. Health Policy. 2016; 120: 1087-94.
17. Lastrucci V, Lorini C, Caini S; Florence Health Literacy Research Group, Bonaccorsi G. Health literacy as a mediator of the relationship between socioeconomic status and health: A crosssectional study in a population-based sample in Florence. PLoS One. 2019 Dec 23; 14(12):
e0227007. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227007
18. Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, Halpern DJ, Crotty K. Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2011; 155(2): 97-107. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005.
19. Williams MV, Baker DW, Parker RM, Nurss JR. Relationship of functional health literacy to patients’ knowledge of their chronic disease. Arch Intern Med. 1998; 158(2): 166-72. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.2.166.
20. Parker RM, Ratzan SC, Lurie N. Health literacy: a policy challenge for advancing high-quality health care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2003; 22(4): 147-53. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.4.147.
21. Baker DW, Parker RM, Williams MV, Clark WS. Health literacy and the risk of hospital admission. J Gen Intern Med 1998; 13(12): 791-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00242.x.
22. Baker DW, Gazmararian JA, Williams MV, et al. Functional Health Literacy and the Risk of Hospital Admission Among Medicare Managed Care Enrollees. Am J Public Health. 2002; 92(8): 1278-83. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.8.1278.
23. Eichler K, Wieser S, Brügger U. The cost of limited health literacy: A systematic review. Int J Public Health. 2009; 54(5): 313-24. doi: 10.1007/ s00038-009-0058-2. Epub 2009 Jul 31.
24, Van den Broucke S. Why health promotion matters to the COVID-19 pandemic, and vice versa. Health Promot Int. 2020; 35(2): 181-6. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaa042.
25. Morgan A, Ziglio E. Revitalising the evidence base for public health: an assets model. Promot Educ. 2007; Suppl 2: 17-22. doi:
10.1177/10253823070140020701x.
26. Kretzman JP, McKnight JL. Building communities from the inside out: a path toward finding and mobilizing a community’s assets. Chicago: ACTA Publications, 1993.
27. Fuller T, Guy D, Pletsch C. Asset mapping: A handbook. 2002. Available on: https://ccednet-rcdec.ca/ sites/ccednet-rcdec.ca/files/asset_mapping_handbook.pdf [Last accessed: 2021 Feb 21].
28. Whiting L, Kendall S, Wills W. An asset-based approach: an alternative health promotion strategy? Community Pract. 2012; 85(1): 25-8.
29. Morgan A. Needs assessment. In: Macdowall W, Bonell C, Davies M, Eds. Health promotion practice. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education, Open University Press, 2006: 21-36.
30. O’Mara-Eves A, Brunton G, Oliver S, Kavanagh J, Jamal F, Thomas J. The effectiveness of community engagement in public health interventions for disadvantaged groups: a metaanalysis. BMC Public Health. 2015; 15: 129. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1352-y.
31. Atkinson J, Vallely A, Fitzgerald L, Whittaker M, Tanner M. The architecture and effect of participation: a systematic review of community participation for communicable disease control and elimination. Implications for malaria elimination. Malar J. 2011; 10: 225. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-10-225.
32. World Health Organization. (WHO). WHO community engagement framework for quality, people-centred and resilient health services. 2017. Available on: https://apps.who.int/iris/ bitstream/handle/10665/259280/WHO-HISSDS-2017.15-eng.pdf;jsessionid=F59753E2F20 F33FF46688F87D07B1AEB?sequence=1 [Last accessed 2021 Feb 21].
33. Lorini C, Caini S, Ierardi F, Bachini L, Gemmi F, Bonaccorsi G. Health Literacy as a Shared Capacity: Does the Health Literacy of a Country Influence the Health Disparities among Immigrants? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 12; 17(4): 1149. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041149.
34. The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Recommendation of the European Parliament and the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning. 2006. Available on: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32006H0962 &from=EN [Last accessed: 2021 Feb 21].
35. Sørensen K, Van den Broucke S, Fullam J, et al. Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12: 80. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-80.
36. Okan O, Bollweg TM, Berens EM, Hurrelmann K, Bauer U, Schaeffer D. Coronavirus-Related Health Literacy: A Cross-Selectional Study in Adults during the COVID-19 Infodemic in Germany. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(15): 5503. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155503.
37. Zarcadoolas C, Pleasant A, Greer DS. Understanding health literacy: an expanded model. Health Promot Int. 2005; 20(2): 195-203. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dah609. Epub 2005 Mar 23.
38. Gharib M. Just for Kids: A Comic Exploring the New Coronavirus. National Public Radio, 2020. Available on: https://www.npr.org/ sections/goatsandsoda/2020/02/28/8095804 53/just-for-kids-a-comic-exploring-the-newcoronavirus?t=1584541381186 [Last accessed: 2021 Feb 21].
39. Okan O, Messer M, Sørensen K. COVID-19: a guide to good practice on keeping people well informed. The Conversation, 2020. Available on: https://theconversation.com/covid-19-a-guide-togood-practice-on-keeping-people-well-informed134046 [Last accessed: 2021 Feb 21].
40. Merchant RM, Lurie N. Social Media and Emergency Preparedness in Response to Novel Coronavirus. JAMA. 2020; 323(20): 2011-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4469.
41. Luengo-Oroz M, Hoffmann Pham K, Bullock J, et al. Artificial intelligence cooperation to support the global response to COVID-19. Nat Mach Intell 2020; 2: 295-7. doi: 10.1038/s42256-0200184-3.
42. Sundareswaran V, Firth-Butterfield K. Chatbots provide millions with COVID-19 information every day, but they can be improved – here’s how. World Economic Forum, 2020. Available on: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/04/ chatbots-covid-19-governance-improved-heres-how/ [Last accessed: 2021 Feb 21].
43. World Health Organization. (WHO). WHO Health Alert brings COVID-19 facts to billions via WhatsApp. 2020. Available on: https://www. who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/whohealth-alert-brings-covid-19-facts-to-billionsvia-whatsapp [Last accessed: 2021 Feb 21].
44. Zarocostas J. How to fight an infodemic. Lancet. 2020; 395(10225): 676. doi: 10.1016/S01406736(20)30461-X.
45. Smith J, Judd J. COVID-19: vulnerability and the power of privilege in a pandemic. Health Promot J Austr. 2020; 31(2): 158-60. doi: 10.1002/ hpja.333. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
46. Moscadelli A, Albora G, Biamonte MA, et al. Fake News and Covid-19 in Italy: Results of a Quantitative Observational Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 12; 17(16): 5850. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165850.
47. Baines D, Elliott RJR. Defining misinformation, disinformation and mal information: An urgent need for clarity during the COVID-19 infodemic; Discussion Papers 20. Birmingham: Department of Economics, University of Birmingham, 2020.
48. Ashrafi-rizi H, Kazempour Z. Information Typology in Coronavirus (COVID-19) Crisis; a Commentary. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2020; 8(1): e19.
49. Ashrafi-rizi H, Kazempour Z. Information Diet in COVID-19 Crisis; a Commentary. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2020; 8(1): e30.
50. Slobodin O, Cohen O. A Culturally-Competent Approach to Emergency Management: What Lessons Can We Learn from the COVID-19? Psychol Trauma. 2020; 12(5): 470-3. doi:
10.1037/tra0000790. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
51. Reicher S, Stott C. On order and disorder during the COVID-19 pandemic. Br J Soc Psychol. 2020; 59(3): 694-702. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12398. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
52. Paakkari L, Okan O. COVID-19: health literacy is an underestimated problem. Lancet Public Health. 2020; 5: e249-50. doi: 10.1016/S24682667(20)30086-4. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
53. Spoonley P, Gluckman P, Bardsley A, et al. He
Oranga Hue: Social Cohesion in a Post-COVID World; Auckland: Koi Tū: The Centre for Informed Futures, University of Auckland, 2020.
54. Keutgen J. Participatory democracy in times of COVID-19. Westminster Foundation for Democracy (WFD), 2020. Available on: https://www.wfd. org/2020/04/06/participatory-democracy-in-timesof-covid-19/ [Last accessed: 2021 Feb 21].
55. Sen A. The idea of justice. London: Allen Lane, 2009.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Transfer of Copyright and Permission to Reproduce Parts of Published Papers.
Authors retain the copyright for their published work. No formal permission will be required to reproduce parts (tables or illustrations) of published papers, provided the source is quoted appropriately and reproduction has no commercial intent. Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.