Evaluation of the effectiveness of three sticky traps to monitor four species of cockroaches (Hexapoda: Blattaria) with simulated use tests

Evaluation of the effectiveness of three sticky traps to monitor four species of cockroaches (Hexapoda: Blattaria) with simulated use tests

Authors

  • A. Drago
  • F. Montarsi
  • M. Dutto
  • S. Martini
  • M. L. Vitale

Keywords:

Blattella germanica, Blatta orientalis, Periplaneta americana, Supella longipalpa, disinfestation, pest, medical entomology, cockroaches

Abstract

Background. Cockroaches are the pest of major concern for the disinfestation programs of the sanitary system in Italy. Hygienic-sanitary interest is linked to the role of mechanical vectors of pathogens and to their allergological potential. Sticky traps are the best tool to monitor the presence of these insects and several types of them are available on the market. In most of the cases the traps are not indicated for a given species, but, instead, generically for cockroaches. Domestic cockroaches differ in morphology, size and habits. Consequently, the effectiveness of the trap can change in relation to the target species.

Materials and methods. In this study three of the most employed traps in Italy were compared: the INDIA trap with and without its attractant tablet (hereafter mentioned as INDIA-A and INDIA-E, respectively), the ZAPI Simply trap and the CATCHMASTER Spider & Insect Glue trap. We chose the four most common species of cockroach (Blattodea) in Italy, Blatta orientalis (L.), Periplaneta americana (L.) (Blattidae), Blattella germanica (L.) and Supella longipalpa (F.) (Blattellidae). Each species of cockroach was tested separately inside arenas containing one of the traps. Each test (one species with one kind of trap) was replicated five times.

Results and discussion. The INDIA-A trap collected more cockroaches of every species, followed by the INDIA-E. The ZAPI trap caught less specimens of each species in respect to the INDIA traps, with the only exception of B. orientalis, for which the ZAPI trap caught more than the INDIA-E. The CATCHMASTER trap performed significantly less for all the species. B. orientalis was the species most abundantly caught by all traps, followed by B. germanica, S. longipalpa and P. americana. No significant difference was observed in the catch according to the developmental stage. In general, there was no particular predisposition of any trap to catch a particular species.

Conclusions. It is not possible to indicate a model of trap for each species of cockroach, but it is clear that different traps have different performances in terms of attractiveness and capture. Therefore, the choice of the trap affects the results of the monitoring, and as consequence, the evaluation of the infesting population of the pest.

References

1. Triplehorn CA, Johnson NF. Borror and Delong’s introduction to the study of insects. 7th Ed. Belmont, CA., U.S.A.: Brooks/Cole, 2005.

2. Ramirez Pérez J. La cucaracha como vector de agentes patógenos [Cockroach as a vector of pathogenic agents]. Spanish. Bol Oficina Sanit Panam 1989; 107(1): 41-53.

3. Tatfeng YM, Usuanlele MU, Orukpe A, et al. Mechanical transmission of pathogenic organism: the role of cockroaches. J Vector Borne Dis 2005; 42(4): 129-34.

4. Mullen GR, Durden LA. Medical and veterinary entomology. 2th Ed. U.S.A.: Elsevier, 2009.

5. Rosenstreich DL, Eggleston P, Kattan M, et al. The role of cockroach allergy and exposure to cockroach allergen in causing morbidity among inner-city children with asthma. N Engl J Med 1997; 336(19): 1356- 63. doi: 10.1056/ nejm199705083361904.

6. Sohn MH, Kim KE. The cockroach and allergic diseases. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res 2012; 4(5): 264-9. doi: 10.4168/aair.2012.4.5.264.

7. Chopard L. Fauna de France 56. Orthopteroides. Paris: Editions Lechevalier, 1951.

8. Lihoreau M, Costa J, Rivault C. The social biology of domiciliary cockroaches: colony structure, kin recognition and collective decisions. Insect Soc 2012; 59: 445-52. doi: 10.1007/s00040-012 -0234-x.

9. Nazari M, Alipourian Motlagh B, Nasirian H. Toxicity of cypermethrin and chlorpyrifos against German cockroach, Blattella germanica (Blattaria: Blattellidae) strains from Hamadan, Iran. Pak J Biol Sci 2016; 19(6): 259-64. doi:

10.3923/pjbs.2016.259.264.

10. Failla MC, Messina A. Insecta Blattaria. In: Ruffo S., Stoch F. (eds.), Checklist e distribuzione della fauna italiana. Memorie Museo Civico Storia Naturale di Verona 2005; 16: 133-4.

11. Dutto M, Süss L. Reperti di Periplaneta americana (Linné, 1758) in Piemonte (Blattaria, Blattidae). Contributo alla conoscenza della geonemia di una specie infestante alloctona. Biologia Ambientale 2013; 27(2): 75-7.

12. Pampiglione G, Ferrari E, Trentini M. Controllo delle blatte: indagine conoscitiva sulle attività ad esse inerenti eseguite dai dipartimenti di prevenzione pubblica dei maggiori capoluoghi d’Italia. Igiene Alimenti – Disinfestazione e Igiene Ambientale 2000; 4: 7-12.

13. Pampiglione G, Velo E. Pest management in Albania: un esempio di coopartecipazione allo sviluppo tecnico-scientifico in salute pubblica. Vet Ital 2010; 46(1): 29-35.

14. Nasirian H. New aspects about Supella longipalpa (Blattaria: Blattellidae). Asian Pac J Trop Dis 2016; 6(12): 1065-75.

15. Nasirian H. Infestation of cockroaches (Insecta: Blattaria) in the human dwelling environments: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Acta Trop 2017; 167: 86-98. doi: 10.1016/j. actatropica.2016.12.019.

16. Jacobs SB. Insect advice from extension: brownbanded cockroaches. Pennsylvania State University, 2013. Available on: ento.psu.edu/extension/ factsheets/brown-banded-cockroaches. [Last accessed: 2021 Jan 1.

17. Rust MK, Reierson DA, Hansgen KH. Control of American cockroaches (Dictyoptera: Blattidae) in sewers. J Med Entomol 1991; 28(2): 210-3.

18. Bell WJ, Adiyodi KG. The American Cockroach. London, UK: Chapman and Hall, 1981.

19. Querner P, Sterflinger K, Piombino-Mascali D, Morrow JJ, Pospischil R, Piñarc G. Insect pests and integrated pest management in the capuchin catacombs of Palermo, Italy. Int Biodeter Biodegr 2018; 131: 107-14. doi: 10.1016/J. IBIOD.2017.02.012.

20. Scirocchi A, Liberali M, Damis P, et al. First survey on arthropod pests associated to handicraft bakeries. Tecnica Molitoria 2004; 55(6): 520-35.

21. Fontana P, Buzzetti FM, Cogo A, Odé B. Guida al riconoscimento e allo studio di cavallette, grilli, mantidi e insetti affini del Veneto. Guide Natura/1. Vicenza, IT: Museo Naturalistico Archeologico di Vicenza, 2002.

22. Le Patourel GNJ. Cold-tolerance of the oriental cockroach Blatta orientalis. Entomol Exp Appl 1993; 68(2): 257-63.

23. Trematerra P, Fleurat-Lessard F. Food industry practices affecting pest management. Stewart Postharvest Rev 2015; 11(1): 1-7. doi: 10.2212/ spr.2015.1.2.

24. Smith LM, Appel AG. Comparison of several traps for catching German cockroaches (Dictyoptera: Blattellidae) under laboratory conditions.

J Econ Entomol 2008; 101(1): 151-8. https://doi.

org/10.1093/jee/101.1.151.

25. Molinari F. Monitoraggio e lotta contro le blatte. In: Domenichini G., Crovetti A, eds. Entomologia urbana e sanità ambientale. Torino: UTET, 1989.

26. Ballard JB, Gold RE. Laboratory and field evaluations of German cockroach (Orthoptera: Blattellidae) traps. J Econ Entomol 1984; 77(3): 661-5. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/77.3.661.

27. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). Guidance on the Biocidal Products Regulation – Volume II Efficacy – Assessment and Evaluation (Parts B + C), version 3.0, April 2018. Helsinki, Finland: ECHA, 2018.

28. Miller DM, Koehler PG, Nation JL. Use of fecal extract trails to enhance trap catch in German cockroach (Dictyoptera: Blattellidae) monitoring stations. J Econ Entomol 2000; 93(3): 865-70. doi: 10.1603/0022-0493-93.3.865.

29. Bell WJ, Roth ML, Nalepa CA. Cockroaches, Ecology, Behavior and Natural History. Baltimore, Maryland: JHU Press, 2007.

30. Moore WS, Granovsky TA. Laboratory comparisons of sticky traps to detect and control five species of cockroaches (Orthoptera: Blattidae and Blatellidae). J Econ Entomol 1983; 76(4): 845-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/76.4.845.

31. Stejskal V. Field tests on trapping efficiency of sticky traps for Blatta orientalis and Blattella germanica (dictyoptera). Anz Schädlingskd Pfl Umwelt 1998; 71(17): 17-21. https://doi. org/10.1007/BF02770566.

32. Mosayebian H, Basseri HR, Baniardalani M, Rassi Y, Ladonni H. Effect of different diets on lifetime of brown-banded cockroaches, Supella longipalpa (Blattodea: Blattellidae). J Arthropod Borne Dis 2017; 11(2): 302-8.

33. Rettich F. Hydramethylnon baits and sticky traps and Blattella germanica (L.) (Dictyoptera: Blattellidae) behavior, pp. 107-11. In: Wildey KB, Robinson WH, eds. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Insect Pests in the Urban Environment. Cambridge, 30 June-3 July 1993.

34. Durier V, Rivault C. Food bait preference in German cockroach, Blattella germanica (L.) (Dictyoptera: Blattellidae), pp. 113-9. In: Robinson W, Rettich F, Rambo GW, eds. Proceedings, 3rd International Conference on Urban Pests. Prague, Czech Republic, 19-22 July 1999.

35. Wang C, Bennett GW. Comparison of cockroach traps and attractants for monitoring German cockroaches (Dictyoptera: Blattellidae). Envi-

ron Entomol 2006; 35(3): 765-70. https://doi. org/10.1603/0046-225X-35.3.765.

36. Phillips ADG, Wyatt TD. Beyond origami: using behavioral observations as a strategy to improve trap design. Entomol Exp Appl 1992; 62(1): 6774. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.1992. tb00643.x.

37. Nalyanya G, Schal C. Evaluation of attractants for monitoring populations of the German cockroach (Dictyoptera: Blattellidae). J Econ Entomol 2001; 94(1): 208-14. doi: 10.1603/00220493-94.1.208.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-04

Issue

Section

Original research

How to Cite

1.
Drago A, Montarsi F, Dutto M, Martini S, Vitale ML. Evaluation of the effectiveness of three sticky traps to monitor four species of cockroaches (Hexapoda: Blattaria) with simulated use tests. Ann Ig. 2025;34(1):97-106. doi:10.7416/ai.2021.2442