Association of Area Deprivation Index with Adherence to Proposed Regimen in Patients with Sarcoidosis in Detroit, Michigan

Main Article Content

Medha R Cherabuddi
Benjamin Goodman
Asem Ayyad
Dina A Almajali
Owais Nadeem
Patrick Bradley
Cori Russell
Daniel Ouellette

Keywords

Healthcare inequalities, health services accessibility, lung diseases

Abstract

Background and aim: Social predictors affect severity of sarcoidosis, with Black patients, older individuals, those with lower income, and those without insurance having greater severity. This study aimed to explore potential disparities affecting access to care in sarcoidosis patients with a primary focus on metrics such as area deprivation index (ADI) and its association with adherence to the proposed regimen.


Methods: A retrospective chart review study of all patients seen in pulmonary clinics at a large urban tertiary care center over 2 years with sarcoidosis patients identified with International Classification of Diseases diagnosis code D86. Data collected included age, race, sex, ADI, insurance, online patient portal usage, chest x-rays, pulmonary function tests, missed visits, hospitalizations, positive biopsy, communication and visits around bronchoscopy. Categorical variables were described using frequency and percentage. Numerical variables were described using median, mean and standard deviation. Statistical analysis included chi-square test, two-sample T-test and Wilcoxon rank sum test. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to model independent association with 12 month no-show occurrence as a metric of adherence to the proposed regimen.


Results: Among sarcoidosis patients (N = 788), univariate models showed the presence of active online patient portal use among younger patients (58.6 years with portal vs. 65.1 years without portal, p < 0.001), those with lower ADI (73 with portal vs. 92 without portal, p < 0.001) and with commercial insurance (48.5% with portal vs. 20.7% without portal, p < 0.001); more x-rays (45.6% with x-rays vs. 36.6% without x-rays, p = 0.018) and hospitalizations (50.3% with hospitalizations vs. 36.2% without hospitalizations, p < 0.001) in Medicare patients. Sarcoidosis patients with positive biopsies on file from 2013-2023 were more likely to be male (44.19% with positive biopsy vs. 33.91% without positive biopsy, p = 0.006), White (36.29% with positive biopsy vs. 22.9% without positive biopsy, p < 0.001) or other races (3.23% with positive biopsy vs. 2.25% without positive biopsy, p < 0.001), younger (55.8 years with positive biopsy vs. 61.7 years without positive biopsy, p < 0.001) and belonged to lower national ADI ranks (73 with positive biopsy vs. 80 without biopsy, p = 0.041). A multivariate analysis was done with those variables found to be significant in the univariate analyses, which revealed that higher ADI national was associated with failure to adhere to the proposed regimen.


Conclusions: We identified intricate patterns of sociodemographic variables affecting access to care in sarcoidosis patients, especially higher ADI national associated with failure to adhere to the proposed regimen, raising concerns for potential healthcare barriers. Understanding these barriers is vital for equitable high-quality care, assisting in timely and efficient management of the patient’s disease.

Abstract 40 | PDF Downloads 26

References


1. Rabin DL, Thompson B, Brown KM, et al. Sarcoidosis: social predictors of severity at presentation. Eur Respir J 2004;24:601-8.
2. Mirsaeidi M, Machado RF, Schraufnagel D, Sweiss NJ, Baughman RP. Racial difference in sarcoidosis mortality in the United States. Chest 2015;147:438-49.
3. Harper LJ, Love G, Singh R, Smith A, Culver DA, Thornton JD. Barriers to care among patients with sarcoidosis: a qualitative study. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2021;18:1832-8.
4. Harper LJ, Gerke AK, Wang XF, et al. Income and other contributors to poor outcomes in U.S. patients with sarcoidosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020;201:955-64.
5. Arkema EV, Cozier YC. Epidemiology of sarcoidosis: current findings and future directions. Ther Adv Chronic Dis 2018;9:227-40.
6. Baughman RP, Field S, Costabel U, et al. Sarcoidosis in America. Analysis based on health care use. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2016;13:1244-52.
7. US Census Bureau. QuickFacts: Detroit city, Michigan; United States. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau; 2022. Accessed 2022 Dec 11. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/detroitcitymichigan,US/PST045221.
8. Goobie GC, Ryerson CJ, Johannson KA, et al. Neighbourhood disadvantage impacts on pulmonary function in patients with sarcoidosis. ERJ Open Res. 2022;8(4):00357-2022. doi:10.1183/23120541.00357-2022
9.. Zhou Y, Gerke AK, Lower EE, et al. The impact of demographic disparities in the presentation of sarcoidosis: a multicenter prospective study. Respir Med 2021;187:106564.
10. Gerke AK, Yang M, Tang F, Cavanaugh JE, Polgreen PM. Increased hospitalizations among sarcoidosis patients from 1998 to 2008: a population-based cohort study. BMC Pulm Med 2012;12:19.
11. Lee YC, Chang KY, Mirsaeidi M. State-level health disparity is associated with sarcoidosis mortality. J Clin Med 2021;10:2366.
12. Sharp M, Eakin MN, Drent M. Socioeconomic determinants and disparities in sarcoidosis. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2020;26(5):568-573.
13. Kron J, Syed A, Iden T, et al. Tackling Health Care Disparities: How to Build a Sarcoidosis Center. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2022;39(3):e2022024.