Physician Burnout Scale: A Reliability and Validity Study Physician Burnout Scale
Main Article Content
Keywords
Burnout, Occupational Burnout, Physician Burnout Scale
Abstract
Study Objectives: Although occupational burnout is experienced at different levels in different professions, it is an important problem affecting individuals’ quality of life and work efficiency. While burnout exists in almost every profession, it is more common in professions that require intensive physical and mental work and constant interaction with people such as medicine. There is no measurement tool developed solely for physicians which can reliably and validly measure physicians’ burnout levels in Turkey. This study aimed to present a scale developed directly for physicians on physician samples that can measure their burnout levels reliably and validly. Methods: Data were collected from a total of 479 physicians. The KMO value calculated to determine the suitability of the data for factor analysis was found to be 0.944. The chi-square statistics calculated as a result of the Barlett test were also significant (chi-square = 20381.76, p <0.01). Results: The findings obtained via exploratory factor analysis demonstrated that the developed scale was composed of 5 factors and explained 68.15% of the total variance. RMSEA= 0,08; CFI= 0.96; NFI: 0.95; NNFI: 0.96; RMR= 0.062 values obtained from confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model had a good fit. Alpha reliability of the whole scale was calculated as 0.98. In addition, the Cronbach alpha reliability values obtained for the factors were found as 0.96; 0.96; 0.88; 0.91 and 0.77, respectively. Conclusions: The findings obtained in this study show that the developed scale offers high reliability and validity values.
References
2. Justice B, Gold RS, Klein JP. Life events and burnout. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied. 1981;108(2):219–226. doi:10.1080/00223980.1981.9915266
3. Jackson SE, Turner JA, Brief AP. Correlates of burnout among public service lawyers. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 1987;8(4):339–349. doi:10.1002/job.4030080406
4. Lacy BE, Chan JL. Physician Burnout: The Hidden Health Care Crisis. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2018;16(3):311–317. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2017.06.043
5. Maslach C, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP. Job burnout. Annual review of psychology. 2001;52:397–422. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397
6. Yates SW. Physician Stress and Burnout. American Journal of Medicine. 2020;133(2):160–164. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.08.034
7. Kuhn CM, Flanagan EM. Self-care as a professional imperative: physician burnout, depression, and suicide. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. 2017;64(2):158–168. doi:10.1007/s12630-016-0781-0
8. Rodrigues H, Cobucci R, Oliveira A, et al. Burnout syndrome among medical residents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(11):1–17. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0206840
9. Demerouti E, Bakker AB, Vardakou I, Kantas A. The convergent validity of two burnout instruments: A multitrait-multimethod analysis. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 2003:19(1):12–23.doi:10.1027/1015-5759.19.1.12
10. Kristensen TS, Borritz M, Villadsen E, Christensen KB. The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory: A new tool for the assessment of burnout. Work & Stress. 2005:19(3):192–207. doi:10.1080/02678370500297720
11. Maslach C & Jackson SE MBI: Maslach burnout inventory. Manual, Palo Alto, CA: University of California, Consulting Psychologists Press, 1981
12. Moreno-Jimenez B, Barbaranelli C, Gálvez-Herrer M, Garrosa E. The physician burnout questionnaire: A new definition and measure. TPM - Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology 2012;19:325-344. doi:10.4473/TPM19.4.6.
13. Pines A & Aronson E, Career Burnout: Causes and Cures, New York; Free Press, 1988
14. Schaufeli WB, De Witte H, Desart S. Manual Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT) – Version 2.0. KU Leuven, Belgium: Unpublished internal report, 2020
15. Shirom A, Melamed S. A comparison of the construct validity of two burnout measures in two groups of professionals. International Journal of Stress Management 2006;13(2): 176–200. doi:10.1037/1072-5245.13.2.176
16. Trockel M, Bohman B, Lesure E et al. A brief instrument to assess both burnout and professional fulfillment in physicians: Reliability and validity, including correlation with self-reported medical errors, in a sample of resident and practicing physicians. Academic Psychiatry. 2018;42(1):11–24. doi:10.1007/s40596-017-0849-3
17. Erkus A & Selvi H. [Measurement and Scale Development in Psychology: Scale Adaptation and Norm Development], Ankara; Pegem, 2019
18. Kline RB, Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 2nd Ed; Guilford Press, 2005
19. Child D, The essentials of factor analysis, 3rd Ed; Continuum, 2006
20. Tabachnick BG & Fidell LS, Using multivariate statistics, MA: Allyn & Bacon, Inc. 2001
21. Macilwraith P, Bennett D. Burnout and Physical Activity in Medical Students. Irish medical journal 2018;111(3):707.
22. Alıcı D. Development of an Attitude Scale Towards School: A study on Reliability and Validity. Education and Science 2013;38(168):318-331.
23. Senocak M, Biostatistics and research methodology, Istanbul; Tıp Kitapevi, 2014
24. Panagioti M, Geraghty K, Johnson J et al. Association between Physician Burnout and Patient Safety, Professionalism, and Patient Satisfaction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Internal Medicine 2018;178(10):1317–1330. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3713
25. Bernstein R. Emotional burnout. British Dental Journal 2019;226(9):635. doi:10.1038/s41415-019-0321-8
26. Riethof N, Bob P, Laker M, Varakova K, Jiraskova T, Raboch J. Burnout syndrome, mental splitting and depression in female health care professionals. Medical Science Monitor 2019;25:5237–5240. doi:10.12659/MSM.915360
27. Romani M, Ashkar K. Burnout among physicians. Libyan Journal of Medicine 2014; 9(1). doi:10.3402/ljm.v9.23556
Article Sidebar
Article Details
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Transfer of Copyright and Permission to Reproduce Parts of Published Papers.
Authors retain the copyright for their published work. No formal permission will be required to reproduce parts (tables or illustrations) of published papers, provided the source is quoted appropriately and reproduction has no commercial intent. Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
