The place of red meat consumption in nutrition habits and factors affecting red meat consumption

Main Article Content

Nildem Kızılaslan

Keywords

Nutrition, red meat, consumer preferences, factors affecting consumption, body mass index

Abstract

In addition to being the most important source of animal protein, red meat is important for human nutrition and health with vitamins, minerals antioxidant substances, and various nutritious elements it contains. In the study, it was aimed to determine individuals’ red meat consumption habits, purchasing behaviors, and factors affecting consumer decisions. In line with this purpose, a questionnaire was administered to 410 consumers chosen through proportional sampling method with 95% confidence interval and 5% error margin. In measuring the factors that individuals consider regarding the place they purchase red meat according to their income levels, a 5-Point Likert type scale, the lowest score being 1 and the highest score being 5, was used. In addition, individuals’ Body Mass Indexes (BMIs) were calculated. The average income level of the individuals was 4,158.21 TL per month, and their average monthly expenditure on food was found as 978.57 TL. The female individuals’ mean BMI was determined to be 24.43±4.05, while it was found to be 26.78±4.19 for male individuals. The average red meat consumption of the participants was found to be 85.85%. It was observed that the income level of the individuals was a factor affecting their amount of red meat consumption. As the level of income increased, so did red meat consumption. In the study, it was determined that the individuals consumed an average of 3,46±1,86 kg red meat a month. According to analysis results, it was determined that there was a statistically significant relationship between red meat consumption and the individuals’ income levels, food expenditures, and their professions. No statistically significant relationship was found between red meat consumption and the individuals’ age, education, gender, marital status, and BMI (kg/m2) of the male and female individuals. In conclusion, it can be claimed that consumption of red meat that is of high quality and contains protein in line with the consumers’ preferences in recommended amounts in daily diet will benefit individuals in terms of health. In this context, red meat consumption should be encouraged in a balanced way in line with consumption texture, and necessary measures that will ensure its consumption as an important element of balanced nutrition should be taken.

Abstract 280 | PDF Downloads 351

References

1. Baysal A. The effect of social ınequalities on nutrition. CU Journal of Medical Faculty 2003; 25 (4): 66-72.
2. Pereira P.M, Vicente A.F. Meat nutritional composition and nutritive role in the human diet. Meat Science 2013; 93(3): 586- 592.
3. FAO, 2021. FAOSTAT. Agriculture organization of the united nations statistics division, economic and social development department, Rome, Italy. Available online: http://faostat3. fao. org/home/E (accessed on 31 October 2021).
4. Pekcan G. Nutritional status in turkey, Abstracts of the 5th International Sports Sciences Congress, 5-7 November 1998; 51-53.
5. Lorcu F, Bolat B.A. Investigation of red meat consumption preferences in edirne province. Tekirdag University Faculty of Agriculture 2012; 9: 71-85.
6. Williams P.G. Nutritional composition of red meat. Nutrition & Dietetic 2007; 64: 113-119.
7. Wyness L, Weichselbaum E, O’Connor A, et al. Red meat in the diet: an update. Nutrition Bulletin 2011; 36 (1): 34-77.
8. Biesalski. Meat as a component of a healthy diet are there any risks or benefits if meat is avoided in the diet?. Meat Science 2005; 70 (3): 509-524.
9. Boada L.D. Henríquez-Hernándeza, L.A., Luzardo, O.P. The impact of red and processed meat consumption on cancer and other health outcomes: epidemiological evidences. Food And Chemical Toxicology: An International Journal Published For The British Industrial Biological Research Association 2016; 92: 236- 244.
10. Wolk A. Potential health hazards of eating red meat (review). Journal of Internal Medicine 2017; 281(2): 106-122.
11. Jiang J, Xiong Y.L. Natural Antioxidants as food and feed additives to promote health benefits and quality of meat products: a review. Meat Science 2016; 120: 107-117.
12. Godfray H.C.J, Aveyard P, Garnett T, et al. Meat consumption, health, and the environment. Science 2018; 361(6399).
13. Mcafee A.J, Emeir M. M, Geraldine J. C, et al. Red meat consumption: an overview of the risks and benefits. Meat Science 2010; 84: 1-13.
14. TUBER, Ministry of health turkey nutrition guide, ISBN: 978-975-590-608-9, 2015. https://dosyasb.saglik.gov.tr/Eklenti/10915,tuber-turkiye-beslenme-rehberipdf.pdf
15. Font-i-Furnols M, Guerrero L. Consumer preference, behavior and perception about meat and meat products: an overview. Meat Science 2014; 98(3): 361-371.
16. Newbold P. Statistics for business and economics. 6th Edn., Prentice-Hall International, New Jersey, USA., ISBN: 013188090, 1995; 867.
17. Gurisi S, Astar M. Statistics with spss in scientific research. Der Bookstore, ISBN: 978-975-353-418-5, 2014.
18. Kalaycı S. SPSS applied multivariate statistics techniques. 7.Print, 2016.
19. Duzgunes O, Kesici T, Gurbuz F. Statistics methods 1. Ankara University Faculty of Agriculture Publications 1983; 229.
20. Malhotra N.K. Marketing research: an applied orientation. 4th Edn., Pearson Education, Mexico, ISBN: 9702604915, 2004; 713.
21. Hair J.F, R.P. Bush D.J. Ortinau. Marketing research: A practical approach for the new millennium. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA. ISBN-13: 9780256195552, 2000; 682.
22. Tosun O.O, Hatırlı S.A. An analysis of red meat purchasing preferences of households in Antalya. Suleyman Demirel University, The Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences 2009;14: 433-445.
23. Kibar M, Mikail N, Yılmaz A. Red meat consumption habits and affecting factors in central district of Siirt province. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Natural Sciences 2019; 6 (4): 720-728.
24. Yaylak E, Taskın T, Koyubenbe N, Konca Y. A Study on determination of red meat consumption behaviors in odemis, Izmir. Journal of Animal Production 2010; 51(1): 21-30.
25. Denli E, Sehribanoglu S, Boran G. A Research on consumption habits of red meat in Sirnak. Food 2016; 41 (3): 141-148.
26. Boz V. Comparative analysis of red meat and poultry buying trends by consumers’ ıncome groups: case study of tekirdag suleymanpaşa district. Tekirdag Namik Kemal University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Department of Agricultural Economics, MSc. Thesis, 2019.
27. Saygın OA. Research on determining of the red meat consumption behaviours on healtcare professionals: the case of Izmir. Ege University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Department of Agricultural Economics, M.Sc. Thesis, 2016.
28. Ilhan G.M. An analysis of red meat consumption preferences in Tekirdag, Namik Kemal University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, M.Sc. Thesis, 2011.
29. Akcay Y, Vatansever O. A research on red meat consumption: a case study of urban area in Kocaeli province. Cankiri Karatekin University Journal of the Institute of Social Sciences 2010; 4(1): 43-60.
30. Aglarcı A. V. Investigation of poultry and red meat consumption via log-linear analysis in Isparta province. Suleyman Demirel University, Science Institute, Department of Animal Science, M.Sc. Thesis, 2015.
31. Karakaya E, Kızıloglu S. Analysis of factors affecting red meat demand of households living in bingol city center. Anatolian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2017; 32: 169-180.
32. Atay O, Gokdal O, Aygun T, Ulker H. Consumption habits of meat in çine district of Aydın Province, IV. National Animal Science Congress, Suleyman Demirel University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Science. Oral Presentations 2004; 1: 348-354.
33. Karakus K, Aygun T, Alarslan E. Consumption habits of meat in centre town of Gaziantep province. Yuzuncu Yıl University, Faculty of Agriculture, Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2008; 18(2): 113-120.
34. Seker I, Ozen A, Guler H, Seker P, Ozden I. Red meat consumption behavior in Elazig and consumers Opinion in Animal Welfare. Journal of Kafkas University Faculty of Veterinary Medicine 2011; 17 (4): 543-550.
35. Ozyurek S, Cebi K, Turkyılmaz D, Esenbuga N, Dagdelen U. Yaprak M.A Study on determination of red meat consumption behaviors and preference of ımported red meat in Erzincan. Journal of Erzincan University Institute of Science and Technology 2019; 12 (1): 263-273.
36. Saner G, Kaya F. An Evaluation on the operation and problems of the red meat market in Turkey. Turkey 5th Agricultural Economics Congress, 18-29 September 2002; 234-237.
37. Resurreccion A.V.A. Sensory aspects of consumers choices for meat and meat products. Meat Science 2004; 66(1): 11-20.
38. Gaytancıoglu S. Investigation of poultry meat consumption level in tekirdag central district. Trakya University Institute of Science and Technology, Tekirdag, M.Sc. Thesis,1999.
39. Cosgrove M. Flynn A. Kiely M. Consomption of red meat, white meat and processed meat in ırish adults in relation to dietry quality, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2005; 93: 933-942.
40. Merlino V. M, Borra D, Verduna T, Massaglia S. Household behavior with respect to meat consumption: differences between households with and without children. Veterinary Sciences 2017; 4(4): 53.
41. Richardson N, Macfie H, Sepherd R. Consumer attitudes to meat eating. Meat Science 1994; 36(1-2): 57-65.
42. Hielkema M.H, Lund T. B. Reducing meat consumption in meat-loving denmark: exploring willingness, behavior, barriers and drivers. Food Quality and Preference 2021; 93: 104257.
43. Eichholzer M. Bisig, B. Daily consumption of red meat or meat products in Switzerland: Result of the 1992/93 Swiss Health Survey. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000; 54: 136-142.
44. Demirtas B. The effect of price ıncreases on fresh meat consumption in Turkey. Acta Univ Agric Silvic Mendelianae Brun 2018; 66(5): 1249-1259.
45. Ulas B. Determining of the effective factors on meat preferences: the case of urban area of Aydın Province, Gaziosmanpasa University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Agricultural Economics, M.Sc. Thesis, 2011.
46. Harguess J. M, Crespo N. C, Hong M. Y. Strategies to reduce meat consumption: a systematic literature review of experimental studies. Appetite 2020; 144: 104478.
47. Aygun T, Karakus F, Yılmaz A, Gokdal O, Ulker H. Consumption habit of meat in centre town of Van Province. 4th National Animal Science Congress, 2004; 361-364.
48. Mathijs E. Exploring future patterns of meat consumption. Meat Science 2015; 109: 112-116.
49. Whitnall T, Pitts N. Global trends in meat consumption. Agricultural Commodities 2019; 9(1): 96-99.
50. Gosard M, York R. Social ınfluences on meat consumption. Human Ecology Review 2003; 10 (1): 1-9.
51. Milford A.B, Le Mouël C, Bodirsky B.L, Rolinski S. Drivers of Meat consumption. Appetite 2019; 141: 104313.
52. Bereznicka J, Pawlonka T. Meat consumption as an ındicator of economic well-being-case study of a developed and developing economy. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Oeconomia 2018; 17(2):17-26.
53. Nalinci S, The meat consumption habits of households and the factors affecting their meat consumption in the province of Amasya. Gaziosmanpasa University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Agricultural Economics, M.Sc. Thesis, 2013.
54. Karakas G. A Research on the determination of factors affecting of consumer decisions on meat and meat products ınurban area of Tokat Province, Gaziosmanpasa University, Graduate School of Naturaland Applied Sciences Department of Agricultural Economics, M.Sc. Thesis, 2010.
55. Wang Z, Zhang B, Zhai F, et al. Fatty and leanred meatcon sumption in china: differential association with chinese abdominal obesity. Nutrition, Metabolism And Cardiovascular Diseases 2014; 24(8):869-76.
56. Wang Z, Zhang B, Wang H, et al. Study on the multilevel and longitudinal association between red meat consumption and changes in body mass ındex, body weight and risk of ıncident overweight among chinese adults. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi 2013; 34(7): 661-667.