The Linear Non-threshold Extrapolation of Dose-Response Curves Is a Challenge for Managing the Risk Associated with Occupational Exposure to Carcinogenic Agents

Main Article Content

Antonio Mutti






Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 250 | PDF Downloads 277


1. National Research Council (US) Committee on the Institutional Means for Assessment of Risks to Public Health. Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 1983.
2. IARC. Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, No. Supplement 7. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Lyon (FR): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 1987.
3. Samet JM, Chiu WA, Cogliano V, et al. The IARC Monographs: Updated Procedures for Modern and Transparent Evidence Synthesis in Cancer Hazard Identification. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020;112(1):30-37. Doi:
4. Nielsen GD, Øvrebø S, Background, approaches and recent trends for setting health-based occupational expo-sure limits: A mini review. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008;51:253-269.
5. McConnell EE, Solleveld HA, Swenberg JA, Boorman GA. Guidelines for Combining Neoplasms for Evaluation of Rodent Carcinogenesis Studies. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1986;76(2):283-289.
6. Calabrese EJ. The Gofman-Tamplin Cancer Risk Controversy and Its Impact on the Creation of BEIR I and the Acceptance of LNT. Med Lav. 2023;114(1):xxx.
7. Calabrese EJ. Linear Non-Threshold (LNT) historical discovery milestones. Med Lav. 2022(Aug 25);113(4):e2022033.
8. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2005: Opinion of the Scientific Committee on a request from EFSA re-lated to a harmonized approach for risk assessment of substances which are both genotoxic and carcinogenic. EFSA Journal, 282,1-31. (accessed Jan 5, 2023).
9. Aleksunes LM, Eaton DL. Principles of Toxicology in Casarett & Doull's Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poisons. Ninth Edition., New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 2019, pp. 25-64.
10. Calabrese EJ, Baldwin LA. Chemical hormesis: its historical foundations as a biological hypothesis.D. 1999 Mar-Apr;27(2):195-216. Doi: 10.1177/019262339902700207.
11. Calabrese EJ, Baldwin LA. Radiation hormesis: its historical foundations as a biological hypothesis. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2000 Jan;19(1):41-75. Doi: 10.1191/096032700678815602.
12. EFSA Scientific Committee, More S, Benford D, et al. Opinion on the impact of non-monotonic dose responses on EFSA′s human health risk assessments. EFSA J. 2021;19(10):6877. Doi:
13. Saracci R. The hazards of hazard identification in environmental epidemiology. Environ Health. 2017;16(1):85. Doi: 10.1186/s12940-017-0296-3