Using Structural Equation Modelling to Predict Safety and Health Status among Stone Industries

Main Article Content

Hossein Akbari
Abbas Bahrami
Sedighe Dehghani Bidgoli
Fahimeh Karamali
Ali Hosseini

Keywords

Organizational structure; safety and health; structural equipment modelling; stone industry

Abstract

Background: The creation of a working organization with a high safety level ensures employees' health in their workplaces, therefore current study evaluated effect the organizational structure on the safety and health in the stone industry. Methods: The study was done among the 100 stone industries in Isfahan, Iran. We asked selected participants to complete the organizational structure questionnaire and ELMERI checklists. tested the hypothesis with Smart PLS 3.0. Results: The model fit index showed the standardized root mean square (SRMR=0.08), the normalized fit index (NFI=0.9), The coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.362), Effect size (ƒ2 was less than 0.2), and the Predictive relevance of the model (Q2=0.216) which is considered a good fit for mode. Also, the relation between formalization and health and safety was significant (β = -0.47). Conclusion: findings suggest that Organization factors are the basic reasons associated with occupational accidents and the main indicator of safety and health performance.

Abstract 313 | PDF Downloads 353

References

REFERENCES
1. Abubakar U. An overview of the occupational safety and health systems of Nigeria, UK, USA, Australia and China: Nigeria being the reference case study. Am Educ Res J. 2015;3(11):1350-8.
2. Aljak M, Nikolić V, Šapić R. Occupational safety management as part of the organization system man-agement. Safety. 2021;7(9):25.
3. Jilcha K, Kitaw D, Beshah B. Workplace innovation influence on occupational safety and health. Afr J Sci Technol. 2016;8:1:33-42. Doi: 10.1080/20421338.2015.1128044
4. Hassard J, Flintrop J, Clausen T, Muylaert K. Motivation for employees to participate in workplace health promotion: Literature review. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. 2012.
5. LO Standards on Occupational Safety and Health: Promoting a Safe and Healthy Working Environment: International Labour Organization; 2009.
6. Hughes P, Ferrett E. Introduction to health and safety in construction: Routledge; 2008.
7. Fabiano B, Parentini I, Ferraiolo A, Pastorino R. A century of accidents in the Italian industry: Rela-tionship with the production cycle. Saf Sci. 1995;21(1):65-74.
8. Hoła B, Nowobilski T, Szer I, Szer J. Identification of factors affecting the accident rate in the construc-tion industry. Procedia Eng. 2017;208:35-42.
9. Taradi J. Preliminarno istraživanje menadžmenta sigurnosti na rad. U: V Zbornik stručno-znanstvenih radova" Čovjek i radna okolina"- Zagreb: IPROZ, Visoka škola za sigurnost. 2004:5-22.
10. Jahangiri M, Rostam Abadi A, Norozi M A, Azmoon H, Jalilian HFK. Risk Assessment And Management Volume 3; Risk Indices. Tehran: Fanavaran; 2012.
11. Robbins S. Organization theory: structure and organizational design. Tehran, Press Saffar Eshragh, 2000.
12. Nasiripour A, Raeissi P, Nagaf Bagy R, Adabi A. The survey of structural factors in general hospitals of Yazd-Iran based on mechanic and organic approach 2012. Toloo-e-behdasht. 2013;12(3):194-204.
13. Jöreskog KG. A general method for estimating a linear structural equation system. ETS Research Bulle-tin Series. 1970;1970(2):i-41.
14. Lomax RG. A guide to LISREL-type structural equation modeling. Behav Res Methods. 1982;14(1):1-8.
15. Lomax RG. A guide to multiple-sample structural equation modeling. Behav Res Methods. 1983;15(6):580-4.
16. Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Mena JA. An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the academy of marketing science. J Acad Mark Sci. 40(3):414-433.
17. Hair Jr JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A primer on partial least squares structural equation mod-eling (PLS-SEM): Sage publications; 2021 384.pp .
18. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and meas-urement error. J Mark Res. 1981;18(1):39-50.
19. Roldán JL, Sánchez-Franco MJ. Variance-based structural equation modeling: Guidelines for using par-tial least squares in information systems research. Research methodologies, innovations and philoso-phies in software systems engineering and information systems: IGI global; 2012. pp. 193-221.
20. Davison AC, Hinkley DV. Bootstrap methods and their application: Cambridge university press; 1997.
21. Efron B, Tibshirani R. Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Stat Sci. 1986:54-75.
22. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavior Sciences, 2nd Edn New York. NY: Academic Press[Google Scholar]. 1988.
23. Tenenhaus M, Vinzi VE, Chatelin Y-M, Lauro C. PLS path modeling. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2005;48(1):159-205.
24. Cox SJ, Cheyne AJ. Assessing safety culture in offshore environments. Saf Sci. 2000;34(1-3):111-29.
25. Mearns K, Whitaker SM, Flin R. Safety climate, safety management practice and safety performance in offshore environments. Sa Sci. 2003;41(8):641-80.
26. Otieno JO, Onditi A, Monari F. Influence of Occupational Accidents Moderated by Occupational Health and Safety Policy Regulations on Performance of Firms in Kenya. J Hum Resour Manag. 2019;7(4):99-107.
27. Patel D, Jha K. Structural equation modeling for relationship-based determinants of safety performance in construction projects. J Manag Eng. 2016;32(6):05016017.
28. Aliabadi MM, Aghaei H, Kalatpour O, Soltanian AR, SeyedTabib M. Effects of human and organizational deficiencies on workers’ safety behavior at a mining site in Iran. Epidemiology and health. 2018;4: e2018019.
29. Oliver A, Cheyne A, Tomas JM, Cox S. The effects of organizational and individual factors on occupation-al accidents. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2002;75(4):473-88.
30. Zhang Y, Shao W, Zhang M, Li H, Yin S, Xu Y. Analysis 320 coal mine accidents using structural equation modeling with unsafe conditions of the rules and regulations as exogenous variables. Accid Anal Prev. 2016;92:189-201.
31. Hoła B, Nowobilski T. Analysis of the influence of socio-economic factors on occupational safety in the construction industry. Sustainability. 2019;11(16):4469.