Cross-cultural validation of a questionnaire on food safety and food security in Italy

Cross-cultural validation of a questionnaire on food safety and food security in Italy

Authors

  • Vincenza Gianfredi Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
  • Daniele Nucci Struttura Semplice Dipartimentale Igiene Alimenti e Nutrizione, Dipartimento di Igiene e Prevenzione Sanitaria, Agenzia di Tutela della Salute (ATS) Brescia, Italy; PhD National Program in One Health Approaches to Infectious Diseases and Life Science Research Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
  • Maria Chiara Croci University of Milan
  • Roberta Ferranti Struttura Semplice Dipartimentale Igiene Alimenti e Nutrizione, Dipartimento di Igiene e Prevenzione Sanitaria, Agenzia di Tutela della Salute (ATS) Brescia, Italy
  • Lorenzo Stacchini Department of Community Healthcare Network, Health District "Toscana ASL Nord Ovest", Pisa, Italy; Medical School of Specialization in Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Florence, Firenze, Italy

Keywords:

food safety, food security , italy, validation studies, questionnaires, psychometrics, cross-cultural comparison, italian population, public health, measurement tool

Abstract

Background and aim: The manuscript focuses on the translation, adaptation, and validation of Food Security Survey Module (FSSM) and Food Safety Knowledge and Behaviour (FSKB) questionnaires for use in the Italian context.

Methods: The online survey was anonymously administered by Microsoft Forms to Italian adults, October-November 2023. The retest questionnaire was done 30 days after the first round. The questionnaire's reliability was assessed using Cronbach's α. Reproducibility was measured using Cohen’s kappa coefficient (κ), and the Kendall's τ correlation coefficient (τ). Feasibility was assessed trough ad hoc questions.

Results: A total of 96 subjects participated to the round of validation. A high level of reliability was found with standardized α of 0.91 and 0.75 for FSSM and FSKB, respectively. The mean κ was 0.669, standard error (SE= 0.019) for FSKB, and τ ranged between 0.595 and 1.000, with significant correlations (p< 0.001). Most participants (76.0%) found the questions clear, with 63.6% completing the survey in less than 10 minutes.

Conclusions: The translation and validation process have yielded reliable and culturally relevant instruments for assessing food safety and food security in the Italian population. These validated questionnaires can serve as valuable tools for future research and interventions in the domain of food safety/security in Italy. 

References

1. Garcia SN, Osburn BI, Jay-Russell MT. One health for food safety, food security, and sustainable food production. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2020;4:1-9. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2020.00001

2. Ahmad R, Munawar H, Saima H, Siddique F. Introductory chapter: food safety. In: Ahmad RS, Babar MR, editors. Food safety. Rijeka: IntechOpen; 2023. p. 1-160.

3. FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, WHO. The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2023. Urbanization, agrifood systems transformation and healthy diets across the rural–urban continuum. In: FAO, editor. The state of food security and nutrition in the world (SOFI). Rome: FAO; 2023. p. 316.

4. World Health Organization. Food safety. Geneva: WHO; 2022 [cited 2024 Jan 20]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/food-safety

5. European Food Safety Authority, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. The European Union One Health 2022 zoonoses report. EFSA J. 2023;21(12):e8442. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8442

6. Perez-Escamilla R. Food security and the 2015–2030 sustainable development goals: from human to planetary health: perspectives and opinions. Curr Dev Nutr. 2017;1(7):e000513. doi: 10.3945/cdn.117.000513

7. Paden H, Hatsu I, Kane K, et al. Assessment of food safety knowledge and behaviors of cancer patients receiving treatment. Nutrients. 2019;11(8):1897. doi: 10.3390/nu11081897

8. United States Department of Agriculture. U.S. adult food security survey module. 2012 [cited 2024 Jan 20]. Available from: https://www.ers.usda.gov/media/8279/ad2012.pdf

9. Allen MJ, Yen WM. Introduction to measurement theory. Long Grove: Waveland Press; 2001.

10. Shoukri MM, Asyali MH, Donner A. Sample size requirements for the design of reliability study: review and new results. Stat Methods Med Res. 2004;13(4):251-71. doi: 10.1191/0962280204sm365ra

11. Pivarnik LF, Patnoad MS, Richard NL, et al. Assessment of food safety knowledge of high school and transition teachers of special needs students. J Food Sci Educ. 2009;8(1):13-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-4329.2008.00063.x

12. Gianfredi V, Nucci D, Ceccarelli F, Villarini M, Moretti M. PILATES (physical activity and diet survey): an Italian self-administered questionnaire evaluating diet habits of gym-goers. Validation process. J Diet Suppl. 2019;16(3):307-17. doi: 10.1080/19390211.2018.1456501

13. Nucci D, Licitra L, Sciara S, Moretti M, Gianfredi V. PRuNUS: design and validation of a questionnaire among prisoners - data of pilot study in the Penitentiary Institute of Perugia, Italy. Int J Prison Health. 2019;16(2):165-83. doi: 10.1108/IJPH-01-2019-0001

14. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3186-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014

15. Bland JM, Altman DG. Cronbach's alpha. BMJ. 1997;314(7080):572. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572

16. Keszei AP, Novak M, Streiner DL. Introduction to health measurement scales. J Psychosom Res. 2010;68(4):319-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.01.006

17. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159-74.

18. Mohamed HS, Ismail KA. Prevalence of food insecurity and associated factors among Cairo University students. J Appl Sci Med Res. 2022;17(1). doi: 10.4103/jasmr.jasmr_5_21

19. Maugliani A, Baldi F. Surveys as a valid tool for assessing food safety knowledge amongst pregnant women in high-income countries: a rapid review. Reprod Toxicol. 2023;119:108411. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2023.108411

20. Calicioglu O, Flammini A, Bracco S, Bellù L, Sims R. The future challenges of food and agriculture: an integrated analysis of trends and solutions. Sustainability. 2019;11(1):222. doi: 10.3390/su11010222

21. Hussain MA, Dawson CO. Economic impact of food safety outbreaks on food businesses. Foods. 2013;2(4):585-9. doi: 10.3390/foods2040585

22. Brouwer ID, McDermott J, Ruben R. Food systems everywhere: improving relevance in practice. Glob Food Sec. 2020;26:100398. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100398

23. Stacchini L, Nucci D, Romano N, et al. Association between socio-demographic characteristics and household food waste behaviors among university students in Italy: the UniFoodWaste study. Sustainability. 2024;16(21):9279. doi: 10.3390/su16219279

24. Grammatikopoulou MG, Gkiouras K, Theodoridis X, et al. Food insecurity increases the risk of malnutrition among community-dwelling older adults. Maturitas. 2019;119:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.10.009

25. Carvajal-Aldaz D, Cucalon G, Ordonez C. Food insecurity as a risk factor for obesity: a review. Front Nutr. 2022;9:1012734. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.1012734

26. Fanzo J. Achieving food security through a food systems lens. In: Béné C, Doyen S, editors. Resilience and food security in a food systems context. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2023. p. 31-52.

27. Sundermeir SM, Wolfson JA, Bertoldo J, Gibson DG, Agarwal S, Labrique AB. Food insecurity is adversely associated with psychological distress, anxiety and depression during the COVID-19 pandemic. Prev Med Rep. 2021;24:101547. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101547

28. Gianfredi V, Mazziotta F, Clerici G, et al. Climate change perception and mental health. Results from a systematic review of the literature. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024;14(1):215-29. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14010014

29. Boliko MC. FAO and the situation of food security and nutrition in the world. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2019;65(Suppl):S4-8. doi: 10.3177/jnsv.65.S4

30. Yu CH. Test–retest reliability. In: Kempf-Leonard K, editor. Encyclopedia of social measurement. New York: Elsevier; 2005. p. 777-84.

31. Howell DC. Statistical methods for psychology. Boston: PWS-Kent Publishing Co; 1992.

32. Khamis H. Measures of association: how to choose? J Diagn Med Sonogr. 2008;24(3):155-62. doi: 10.1177/8756479308317006

Downloads

Published

24-04-2025

How to Cite

1.
Gianfredi V, Nucci D, Croci MC, Ferranti R, Stacchini L. Cross-cultural validation of a questionnaire on food safety and food security in Italy. Acta Biomed. 2025;96(2):16561. doi:10.23750/abm.v96i2.16561

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL CLINICAL RESEARCH

How to Cite

1.
Gianfredi V, Nucci D, Croci MC, Ferranti R, Stacchini L. Cross-cultural validation of a questionnaire on food safety and food security in Italy. Acta Biomed. 2025;96(2):16561. doi:10.23750/abm.v96i2.16561