Cross-cultural validation of a questionnaire on food safety and food security in Italy
Keywords:
food safety, food security , italy, validation studies, questionnaires, psychometrics, cross-cultural comparison, italian population, public health, measurement toolAbstract
Background and aim: The manuscript focuses on the translation, adaptation, and validation of Food Security Survey Module (FSSM) and Food Safety Knowledge and Behaviour (FSKB) questionnaires for use in the Italian context.
Methods: The online survey was anonymously administered by Microsoft Forms to Italian adults, October-November 2023. The retest questionnaire was done 30 days after the first round. The questionnaire's reliability was assessed using Cronbach's α. Reproducibility was measured using Cohen’s kappa coefficient (κ), and the Kendall's τ correlation coefficient (τ). Feasibility was assessed trough ad hoc questions.
Results: A total of 96 subjects participated to the round of validation. A high level of reliability was found with standardized α of 0.91 and 0.75 for FSSM and FSKB, respectively. The mean κ was 0.669, standard error (SE= 0.019) for FSKB, and τ ranged between 0.595 and 1.000, with significant correlations (p< 0.001). Most participants (76.0%) found the questions clear, with 63.6% completing the survey in less than 10 minutes.
Conclusions: The translation and validation process have yielded reliable and culturally relevant instruments for assessing food safety and food security in the Italian population. These validated questionnaires can serve as valuable tools for future research and interventions in the domain of food safety/security in Italy.
References
1. Garcia SN, Osburn BI, Jay-Russell MT. One health for food safety, food security, and sustainable food production. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2020;4:1-9. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2020.00001
2. Ahmad R, Munawar H, Saima H, Siddique F. Introductory chapter: food safety. In: Ahmad RS, Babar MR, editors. Food safety. Rijeka: IntechOpen; 2023. p. 1-160.
3. FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, WHO. The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2023. Urbanization, agrifood systems transformation and healthy diets across the rural–urban continuum. In: FAO, editor. The state of food security and nutrition in the world (SOFI). Rome: FAO; 2023. p. 316.
4. World Health Organization. Food safety. Geneva: WHO; 2022 [cited 2024 Jan 20]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/food-safety
5. European Food Safety Authority, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. The European Union One Health 2022 zoonoses report. EFSA J. 2023;21(12):e8442. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8442
6. Perez-Escamilla R. Food security and the 2015–2030 sustainable development goals: from human to planetary health: perspectives and opinions. Curr Dev Nutr. 2017;1(7):e000513. doi: 10.3945/cdn.117.000513
7. Paden H, Hatsu I, Kane K, et al. Assessment of food safety knowledge and behaviors of cancer patients receiving treatment. Nutrients. 2019;11(8):1897. doi: 10.3390/nu11081897
8. United States Department of Agriculture. U.S. adult food security survey module. 2012 [cited 2024 Jan 20]. Available from: https://www.ers.usda.gov/media/8279/ad2012.pdf
9. Allen MJ, Yen WM. Introduction to measurement theory. Long Grove: Waveland Press; 2001.
10. Shoukri MM, Asyali MH, Donner A. Sample size requirements for the design of reliability study: review and new results. Stat Methods Med Res. 2004;13(4):251-71. doi: 10.1191/0962280204sm365ra
11. Pivarnik LF, Patnoad MS, Richard NL, et al. Assessment of food safety knowledge of high school and transition teachers of special needs students. J Food Sci Educ. 2009;8(1):13-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-4329.2008.00063.x
12. Gianfredi V, Nucci D, Ceccarelli F, Villarini M, Moretti M. PILATES (physical activity and diet survey): an Italian self-administered questionnaire evaluating diet habits of gym-goers. Validation process. J Diet Suppl. 2019;16(3):307-17. doi: 10.1080/19390211.2018.1456501
13. Nucci D, Licitra L, Sciara S, Moretti M, Gianfredi V. PRuNUS: design and validation of a questionnaire among prisoners - data of pilot study in the Penitentiary Institute of Perugia, Italy. Int J Prison Health. 2019;16(2):165-83. doi: 10.1108/IJPH-01-2019-0001
14. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3186-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
15. Bland JM, Altman DG. Cronbach's alpha. BMJ. 1997;314(7080):572. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572
16. Keszei AP, Novak M, Streiner DL. Introduction to health measurement scales. J Psychosom Res. 2010;68(4):319-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.01.006
17. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159-74.
18. Mohamed HS, Ismail KA. Prevalence of food insecurity and associated factors among Cairo University students. J Appl Sci Med Res. 2022;17(1). doi: 10.4103/jasmr.jasmr_5_21
19. Maugliani A, Baldi F. Surveys as a valid tool for assessing food safety knowledge amongst pregnant women in high-income countries: a rapid review. Reprod Toxicol. 2023;119:108411. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2023.108411
20. Calicioglu O, Flammini A, Bracco S, Bellù L, Sims R. The future challenges of food and agriculture: an integrated analysis of trends and solutions. Sustainability. 2019;11(1):222. doi: 10.3390/su11010222
21. Hussain MA, Dawson CO. Economic impact of food safety outbreaks on food businesses. Foods. 2013;2(4):585-9. doi: 10.3390/foods2040585
22. Brouwer ID, McDermott J, Ruben R. Food systems everywhere: improving relevance in practice. Glob Food Sec. 2020;26:100398. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100398
23. Stacchini L, Nucci D, Romano N, et al. Association between socio-demographic characteristics and household food waste behaviors among university students in Italy: the UniFoodWaste study. Sustainability. 2024;16(21):9279. doi: 10.3390/su16219279
24. Grammatikopoulou MG, Gkiouras K, Theodoridis X, et al. Food insecurity increases the risk of malnutrition among community-dwelling older adults. Maturitas. 2019;119:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.10.009
25. Carvajal-Aldaz D, Cucalon G, Ordonez C. Food insecurity as a risk factor for obesity: a review. Front Nutr. 2022;9:1012734. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.1012734
26. Fanzo J. Achieving food security through a food systems lens. In: Béné C, Doyen S, editors. Resilience and food security in a food systems context. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2023. p. 31-52.
27. Sundermeir SM, Wolfson JA, Bertoldo J, Gibson DG, Agarwal S, Labrique AB. Food insecurity is adversely associated with psychological distress, anxiety and depression during the COVID-19 pandemic. Prev Med Rep. 2021;24:101547. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101547
28. Gianfredi V, Mazziotta F, Clerici G, et al. Climate change perception and mental health. Results from a systematic review of the literature. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024;14(1):215-29. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14010014
29. Boliko MC. FAO and the situation of food security and nutrition in the world. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2019;65(Suppl):S4-8. doi: 10.3177/jnsv.65.S4
30. Yu CH. Test–retest reliability. In: Kempf-Leonard K, editor. Encyclopedia of social measurement. New York: Elsevier; 2005. p. 777-84.
31. Howell DC. Statistical methods for psychology. Boston: PWS-Kent Publishing Co; 1992.
32. Khamis H. Measures of association: how to choose? J Diagn Med Sonogr. 2008;24(3):155-62. doi: 10.1177/8756479308317006
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Vincenza Gianfredi, Daniele Nucci, Maria Chiara Croci, Roberta Ferranti, Lorenzo Stacchini

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Transfer of Copyright and Permission to Reproduce Parts of Published Papers.
Authors retain the copyright for their published work. No formal permission will be required to reproduce parts (tables or illustrations) of published papers, provided the source is quoted appropriately and reproduction has no commercial intent. Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.