elbow loss, radial brachio muscle flap, elbow reconstruction, orthoplastic, medical-legal implications
The loss of skin substance near the elbow region with exposure of noble tissues (tendons, neuro-vascular beams and bone and articular surfaces) is a difficult challenge requiring adequate and accurate surgical reconstruction. Insufficient repair of soft tissue defects in the elbow can compromise reconstructive orthopedic surgical treatment, such as osteosynthesis, by fracture or partial or total prosthetization. It is difficult to establish the correct reparative sequence of these lesions. This can negatively affect the functional outcomes of the whole upper limb, with reverberations also on the aesthetic level and greater representation of menomative sequelae incidents on the actual extent of the permanent posthumous patient. The first step is represented by appropriate debridement which allows the removal of all non-viable tissue. Then proceed with the choice of method of covering the loss of substance.
The elbow is one of the most complex anatomical regions from the point of view of the surgical-reconstructive strategy. It often records scarce reconstructive results, with fearful disabling reverberations and negative repercussions in the work environment. It is inevitably susceptible to deliberate medical-legal assessment.
The authors describe a clinical case using brachiradial muscle flap on humerus-infected pseudoarthrosis.
2. Bishop AT. Soft tissue loss about the elbow. Selecting optimal coverage. Hand clinics. 1994 Aug;10(3):531–542.
3. Jensen M, Moran SL. Soft tissue coverage of the elbow: a reconstructive algorithm. The Orthopedic clinics of North America. 2008 Apr;39(2):251–264.
4. Patel KM, Higgins JP. Posterior elbow wounds: soft tissue coverage options and techniques. The Orthopedic clinics of North America. 2013 Jul;44(3):409–417.
5. Orgill DP, Pribaz JJ, Morris DJ. Local fasciocutaneous flaps for olecranon coverage. Annals of plastic surgery. 1994 Jan;32(1):2
6. Geddes CR, Morris SF, Neligan PC. Perforator flaps: evolution, classification, and applications. Ann Plast Surg 2003; 50: 90-9.
7. Panse N, Sahasrabudhe P. Free style perforator based propeller flaps: simple solutions for upper extremity reconstruction. 2014 Indian J Plast Surg 47(1):77–84
8. Del Bene M.-Amadei F. Microchirurgia e Traumatologia della Mano. Casa Editrice Piccin 2007 – ISBN 978-88-299-1301
9. Park JJ, Kim JS, Chung JI. Posterior interosseous free flap: various types. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 1997 Oct;100(5):1186–1197. discussion 1198-1189.
10. Mordick TG, Britton EN, Brantigan C. Pedicled latissimus dorsi transfer for immediate soft-tissue coverage and elbow flexion. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 1997 May;99(6):1742–1744.
11. Rohrich RJ, Ingram AE., Jr. Brachioradialis muscle flap: clinical anatomy and use in soft-tissue reconstruction of the elbow. Annals of plastic surgery. 1995 Jul;35(1):70–76.
12. Derderian CA, Olivier WAM, Baux G, et al. Microvascular free-tissue transfer for traumatic defects of the upper extremity: a 25-year experience. J Reconstr Microsurg 2003; 19: 455-61.
13. Leininger BE, Rasmussen TE, Smith DL et al. Experience with wound VAC and delayed primary closure of contaminated soft tissue injuries in Iraq. J Trauma 2006; 61: 1207- 11.
14. Hallock GG. The utility of both muscle and fascia flaps in severe upper extremity trauma. J Trauma 2002; 53: 61-56
15. Choudry UH, Moran SL, Li S, Khan S. Soft-tissue coverage of the elbow: an outcome analysis and reconstructive algorithm. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2007 May;119(6):1852–1857.
16. Stevanovic M, Sharpe F, Itamura JM. Treatment of soft tissue problems about the elbow. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2000 Jan;(370):127–137.