Main Article Content
satisfaction; students; setting; midwifery; training; interns
Background and aim of the work. The clinical internship is fundamental for the training of the future socio-health professional. Through the practical activity, the student develops professional skills, critical thinking and decision-making ability, internalizing the complexity of the professional role. While in the nursing field there are several tools for assessing the clinical experience of students, in the obstetric field there is a lack of validated tools. Therefore, the purpose of this work was to investigate the perception of the students of the Degree Course in Midwifery regarding the internship experience. Method. The study was conducted at the obstetric clinical internship where students carry out practical activities and involved all the students of the Degree Course in Midwifery at the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia. The data were collected through an anonymous online questionnaire (Google Model), which was inspired by the nursing CLES + T, simplified and adapted to the obstetric field. Results. In total, 54 students took part in the research (81.8% of all students enrolled in the degree program examined). They were mainly of Italian nationality (98.1%), women (94.4%), aged between 18-22 years (85.2%). In general, the third-year students were more satisfied with the internship experience than the second- and first-year students, most likely for having achieved a degree of autonomy of care, awareness and greater professional motivation. Conclusions. The results indicate the need to periodically investigate the quality and satisfaction of the clinical internships to ensure increasingly effective obstetric training.
2. Federazione Nazionale degli Ordini della Professione di Ostetrica. Codice Deontologico dell’Ostetrica/o [Code of ethics of midwives]. Approvato dal Consiglio Nazionale nella seduta del 18 novembre 2017.
3. Tomietto M, Saiani L, Saarikoski M, Fabris S, Cunico L, Campagna V & Palese A. La valutazione della qualità degli ambienti di apprendimento clinico: Studio di validazione del clinical learning environment and supervision (CLES) nel contesto italiano [Evaluation of the quality of clinical learning environments: Validation study of clinical learning environments and supervision (CLES) in the Italian context]. GIMLE 2009; 31(3), B49-55.
4. Leducq, M., Walsh, P., Hinsliff-Smith, K. & McGarry, J. A key transition for student nurses: the first placement experince. Nurs Educ Today 2012; 32(7), 779-781.
5. Perli S. & Brugnolli A. Italian nursing students’s perception of their clinical learning environment as measured with the CLEI tool. Nurs Educ Today 2009;29(8), 886-890.
6. Chan D. Associations between student learning outcomes from their clinical placement and their perceptions of the social climate of the clinical learning environment. IJNS, 2002; 39(5), 517-524.
7. Benner P. From novice to expert, excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Volume 8, Issue1 1985 Pages 95-97.
8. Saiani L. Il ruolo del coordinatore nel promuovere ambienti formativi e tirocini di qualità per gli studenti delle professioni sanitarie [The role of the Coordinator in promoting educational evironments and quality interships for students in the health professions]. Cplps, Bologna 2009.
9. Saiani L, Bielli S, Marognolli O, Brugnolli A et alii, Documento di indirizzo su standard e principi del tirocinio nei corsi di Laurea delle Professioni Sanitarie, Conferenza Permanente dei Corsi di Laurea delle Professioni Sanitarie [Guidance Document on standards and principles of the internship in the Degree courses of the Health Professions, Permanent Conference of the Degree Courses of the Health Professions]. Cplps, 23 dicembre 2009.
10. Maxwell E, Black S, Baillie L. The role of the practice educator in supporting nursing and midwifery students' clinical practice learning: An appreciative inquiry. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice 2015 Vol 5, No 1.
11. I tutor per la formazione nel Servizio sanitario regionale dell’Emilia-Romagna. Rapporto preliminare. [Tutors for training in the regional Health Service of Emilia-Romagna. Preliminary report]. Servizio Sanitario Regionale, Dossier 174 – 2009.
12. Brunstad A, Giske T, Hjälmhult E. How midwifery students experience learning conditions in labor wards. Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bergen University. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice 2016; 6(4).
13. Hosoda Y. Development and testing of a Clinical Learning Environment Diagnostic Inventory for baccalaureate nursing students. J Adv Nurs 2006; 56: 480-90.
14. Chan D. Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in assessing hospital learning environments. Int J Nurs Stud 2001; 38(4): 447-59.
15. Tomietto M, Saiani L, Palese A, Cunico L, Cicolini G, Watson P & Saarikoski M. Clinical learning environment and supervision plus nurse teacher (CLES+T) scale: testing the psychometric characteristics of the Italian version. GIMLE Supplemento B, Psicologia, 2012; 34, B72-B80.
16. Comparcini D, Tomietto M, Simonetti V, Zambri F, Cicolini G. Percezione e soddisfazione degli studenti in Ostetricia al primo anno di tirocinio clinico: studio osservazionale multicentrico [ Perception and satisfaction of midwifery students in the first year of clinical training: multicenter observational study], Prof Inferm. 2016; 69(2):95-102
17. Saarikoski M, Isoaho H, Warne T, Leino-Kilpi Hb,The nurse teacher in clinical practice: developing the new sub-dimension to the Clinical Learning Environment and Supervision (CLES) Scale. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008; 45(8):1233-7.
18. Persson EK, Kvist LJ, Ekelin M, Analysis of midwifery students' written reflections to evaluate progression in learning during clinical practice at birthing units. Nurse Educ Pract. 2015; 15(2):134-40.