Simple and stable elbow dislocations: results after conservative treatment

Main Article Content

Filippo Calderazzi
Alice Garzia
Massimiliano Leigheb
Margherita Menozzi
Alessandro Nosenzo
Francesco Ceccarelli
Enrico Vaienti
Francesco Pogliacomi

Keywords

elbow, dislocation, stiffness, instability

Abstract

Background and aim of the work: In adults, elbow dislocations are second in frequency after shoulder dislocations. They are often the result of a trauma due to accidental falls on the palm of the hand with the elbow flexed. In most cases this mechanism produces a posterior dislocation of the radius and ulna with respect to the humerus. The therapeutic approach was usually conservative in the past and it was characterized by manual reduction and plaster immobilization. More recently, as consequence of biomechanic and pathophysiology studies, the management of these injuries has gradually changed. The current trend is to immobilize the elbow only for few days and to evaluate its stability several times. In case of instability surgery may be indicated.
The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of simple stable elbow dislocations treated conservatively
between january 2012 and december 2018. Methods: Twenty-six patients were included. All subjects underwent
to a follow-up visit, in which clinical functional tests were performed in order to evaluate any stiffness
in flexion-extension, prono-supination and instability in varus-valgus. In addition, patients were asked to
complete three questionnaires (DASH, MEPS, SF-36) to evaluate how much the pathology interfered with
ADL’s. Results: Outcomes showed that prolonged immobilization increased stiffness in flexion and extension
with the need of longer reabilithation. The recovery of prono-supination was instead always optimal. ADL’s
migth be influenced by the traumatic event and its management. Conclusions: Results of conservative treatment of simple elbow dislocation are generally satisfactory. A precise flow-chart of the patient management after trauma is essential in order to detect unstable lesions and

Abstract 838 | PDF Downloads 297

References

1. Josefsson PO, Nilsson BE. Incidence of elbow dislocation. Acta Orthop Scand 1986 Dec; 57(6): 537-8.
2. Hobgood ER, Khan SO, Field LD. Acute dislocations of the adult elbow. Hand Clin 2008 Feb; 24(1): 1-7.
3. Cusick MC, Bonnaig NS, Azar FM, Mauck BM, Smith RA, Throckmorton TW. Accuracy and reliability of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score. J Hand Surg Am 2014 Jun; 39(6): 1146-50.
4. Stoneback JW, Owens BD, Sykes J, Athwal GS, Pointer L, Wolf JM. Incidence of elbow dislocations in the United States population. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012 Feb 1; 94(3): 240-5.
5. Mehlhoff TL, Noble PC, Bennett JB, Tullos HS. Simple dislocation of the elbow in the adult. Results after closed treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988 Feb; 70(2): 244-9.
6. Hobgood ER, Khan SO, Field LD. Acute dislocations of the adult elbow. Hand Clin 2008 Feb; 24(1) :1-7.
7. Ross G, McDevitt ER, Chronister R, Ove PN. Treatment of simple elbow dislocation using an immediate motion protocol. Am J Sports Med 1999 May-Jun; 27(3): 308-11.
8. Krticka M, Ira D, Flek M, Svancara J, Pikula R. A Comparative Study of Conservative Functional Treatment versus Acute Ligamentous Repair in Simple Dislocation of the Elbow in Adults. Indian J Orthop 2018 Nov-Dec; 52(6): 584-9.
9. Schnetzke M, Aytac S, Keil H, Deuss M, Studier-Fischer S, Grützner PA, Guehring T.Unstable simple elbow dislocations: medium-term results after non-surgical and surgical treatment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017 Jul;25(7):2271-2279. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4100-7. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
10. Mehlhoff TL, Noble PC, Bennett JB, Tullos HS. Simple dislocation of the elbow in the adult. Results after closed treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988 Feb; 70(2): 244-9.
11. Kesmezacar H, Sarıkaya IA. The results of conservatively treated simple elbow dislocations. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2010; 44(3): 199-205.
12. Coulibaly NF, Moustapha NM, Djoumoi HH, Lamine S, Badara GA, Daniel SA. Management Of Recent Elbow Dislocations: Functional Treatment Versus Immobilization; A Prospective Study About 60 Cases. Open Orthop J 2017 May 30; 11: 452-9.


13. McCabe MP, Savoie FH 3rd. Simple elbow dislocations: evaluation, management, and outcomes. Phys Sportsmed 2012 Feb; 40(1): 62-71.
14. Iordens GI, Van Lieshout EM, Schep NW, De Haan J, Tuinebreijer WE, Eygendaal D, Van Beeck E, Patka P, Verhofstad MH, Den Hartog D; FuncSiE Trial Investigators. Early mobilisation versus plaster immobilisation of simple elbow dislocations: results of the FuncSiE multicentre randomised clinical trial. Br J Sports Med 2017 Mar;51 (6) :531-8.
15. Pogliacomi F., Galavotti C., Cavaciocchi M., Corradi M., Rotini R., Ceccarelli F. Total elbow arthroplasty following traumas: mid-term results. Acta Biomedica 2013; 84(3): 212-218.
16. Pogliacomi F., Aliani D., Cavaciocchi M., Corradi M., Ceccarelli F., Rotini R. Total elbow arthroplasty in distal humeral nonunion: clinical and radiographic evaluation after a minimum follow-up of three years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015 Dec; 24(12): 1998-2007.
17. Pogliacomi F., Schiavi P., Pedrazzini A., Nosenzo A., Tocco S., Ceccarelli F. Modified Mason type III and IV radial head fractures: results of different treatments. Acta Biomedica 2015; 86(3): 242-250.
18. Corradi M., Frattini M., Tocco S., Panno B., Pogliacomi F. Linked semi-constrained total elbow prosthesis in chronic arthritis: results of 18 cases. Musculoskeletal Surgery vol. 94; Suppl 1/May 2010: 11-23.