Fungal contamination in a University building

Fungal contamination in a University building

Authors

Keywords:

Parole chiave: aria, ambienti confinati, contaminazione fungina, campionamento dell’aria., Key words: air, indoor environment, fungal contamination, air sampling

Abstract

Background. It is recognized that airborne fungi can cause illnesses in humans but data on environmental exposure are still poor. The aim of this study was to evaluate the fungal airborne contamination in a university building. Methods. The study was performed in February and May 2018; air samples were collected, before activity (on Monday) and during activity, (on Friday), both through active (CFU/m3) and passive (Index of microbial air contamination, IMA) method. Fungi were identified by using the scotch test. Results. In February the median fungal contamination value decreased from 14 CFU/m3 before activity to 7 CFU/m3 during activity, while IMA median remains 0. Instead in May both increased during activity (from 87 to 140 CFU/m3; from 5.5 to 7.5 IMA). Overall values increased in May compared to February. Aspergillus spp., Penicillium spp.,  Cladosporium spp. Absidia spp. were the genera most frequently isolated in both months, while in May Chaetomium spp. e Ulocladium spp. were recovered too. Conclusions. Seasonal trend in the levels of fungal contamination of the air was observed, with a statistically significant increase in May. This study represents the first step of a wider study aimed at enhancing knowledge about air fungal contamination.

References

Bibliografia.


1) Méheust D., Le Cann P., Reboux G., Millon L., and Gangneux J.P. Indoor fungal contamination: Health risks and measurement methods in hospitals, homes and workplaces Crit Rev Microbiol, 2014; 40(3): 248–260

2) World Health Organization (WHO) Europe. WHO Guidelines for indoor air quality, dampness and mould. 2009 Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO.

3) Pasquarella C., Albertini R., Dall'aglio P., Saccani E., Sansebastiano G.E., Signorelli C.
Air microbial sampling: the state of the art .Ig Sanita Pubbl. 2008;64(1):79-120.

4) Pasquarella C., Pitzurra O. and A. Savino A. The index of microbial air contamination J Hosp Infect 2000;46:241–256

5) Pitzurra M, Savino A, Pasquarella C. Microbiological environment monitoring (MEM) Ann. Ig., 1997; 9(6):439-454

6) Di Giulio M., Grande R., Di Campli E., Di Bartolomeo S., Cellini L. Indoor air quality in university environments Environ Monit Assess 2010;170:509–517

7) Stryjakowska-Sekulska M., Piotraszewska-Pająk A., Szuszka A., Nowicki M., Filipiak M. Microbiological quality of indoor air in university room. Polish J. Environ. Stud. 2007;16:623-632

8) Abdel Hameed A., Saeeda Y., Hassana Y, Fawzyb Y, Osmanc M. Air microbial quality in certain public buildings, Egypt: A comparative study. Atm. Poll. Res. 2018;9:617–626

9) European Collaborative Action. Indoor Air Quality & Its Impact on Man, Report N° 12 Biological Particles in Indoor Environment. Commission of the European Communities EUR 14988 EN 1993

10) INAIL Il monitoraggio microbiologico negli ambienti di lavoro Campionamento e analisi edizione 2010

Downloads

Published

10-04-2020

How to Cite

1.
Zoni R, Capobianco E, Viani I, Colucci ME, Mezzetta S, Affanni P, et al. Fungal contamination in a University building. Acta Biomed [Internet]. 2020 Apr. 10 [cited 2024 Jul. 23];91(3-S):150-3. Available from: https://mattioli1885journals.com/index.php/actabiomedica/article/view/9426