Readiness for interprofessional learning among medical students: a scoping review protocol

Readiness for interprofessional learning among medical students: a scoping review protocol

Authors

Keywords:

Learning; Interprofessional Education; Students, Medical; Literature review protocol; Scoping review

Abstract

Background and aim: Interprofessional education initiatives have been identified as promising strategies for providing high-quality, comprehensive, and effective health care. Interprofessional education can improve attitudes toward collaboration and teamwork during training, thereby improving attitudes toward interprofessional practice after graduation. Medicine and nursing are the fields most engaged in interprofessional education. Success in teaching and learning in this area depends on readiness for interprofessional education. Therefore, mapping this readiness among students may help higher education institutions establish or improve their respective approaches. The aim of this protocol is to map the literature to identify available evidence on the readiness for interprofessional learning among medical students. Research question: What data are available in the literature on readiness for interprofessional learning among medical students? Source of evidence: Literature search will be performed through the following databases: Scopus, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), PubMed, Biomed Central Journal, Wiley-Blackwell, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Education Resource Information Center (ERIC). Methods: This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and the results, presented through a PRISMA flowchart. Review registration: Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/7acnq/.

 

References

World Health Organization. Framework for Action on Interprofessional Education & Collaborative Practice. Practice [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2022 Apr 25];1–63. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/framework-for-action-on-interprofessional-education-collaborative-practice. ISBN: 00907421.

Körner M, Bütof S, Müller C, Zimmermann L, Becker S, Bengel J. Interprofessional teamwork and team interventions in chronic care: A systematic review. J Interprof Care [Internet]. 2016 Jan 2;30(1):15–28. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2015.1051616.

Mezirow J. Transformative learning theory. In: Illeris K, editor. Contemporary Theories of Learning. 2nd editio. London, United Kingdon: Routledge; 2018. p. 301–20. doi: 10.4324/9781315147277.

Thistlethwaite JE, Forman D, Matthews LR, Rogers GD, Steketee C, Yassine T. Competencies and Frameworks in Interprofessional Education. Acad Med [Internet]. 2014 Jun;89(6):869–75. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000249.

Gontijo ED, Freire Filho JR, Forster AC. Educação Interprofissional em Saúde: abordagem na perspectiva de recomendações internacionais. Cad do Cuid [Internet]. 2020 Jan 14;3(2). doi: 10.29397/cc.v3n2.186.

Hudson JN, Lethbridge A, Vella S, Caputi P. Decline in medical students’ attitudes to interprofessional learning and patient-centredness. Med Educ [Internet]. 2016 May;50(5):550–9. doi: 10.1111/medu.12958.

Gilbert JH. Interprofessional learning and higher education structural barriers. J Interprof Care [Internet]. 2005 May 6;19(sup1):87–106. doi: 10.1080/13561820500067132.

Kozmenko V, Bye EJ, Simanton E, Lindemann J, Schellpfeffer SE. The Optimal Time to Institute Interprofessional Education in the Medical School Curriculum. Med Sci Educ [Internet]. 2017 Jun 11;27(2):259–66. doi: 10.1007/s40670-017-0391-7.

Berger-Estilita J, Fuchs A, Hahn M, Chiang H, Greif R. Attitudes towards Interprofessional education in the medical curriculum: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Med Educ [Internet]. 2020 Dec 6;20(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02176-4.

Abu-Rish E, Kim S, Choe L, et al. Current trends in interprofessional education of health sciences students: A literature review. J Interprof Care [Internet]. 2012 Nov 27;26(6):444–51. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2012.715604.

Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, et al. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet [Internet]. 2010 Dec;376(9756):1923–58. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5.

Thompson DS, Abourbih J, Carter L, et al. Views from the field: Medical student experiences and perceptions of interprofessional learning and collaboration in rural settings. J Interprof Care [Internet]. 2018 May 4;32(3):339–47. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1409703.

Rodrigues da Silva Noll Gonçalves J, Noll Gonçalves R, da Rosa SV, et al. Potentialities and limitations of Interprofessional Education during graduation: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. BMC Med Educ [Internet]. 2023 Apr 12;23(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04211-6.

Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol [Internet]. 2005 Feb;8(1):19–32. doi: 10.1080/1364557032000119616.

Peters MDJ, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares CB. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc [Internet]. 2015 Sep;13(3):141–6. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050.

Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Implement [Internet]. 2021 Mar;19(1):3–10. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000277.

Institute JB. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis - Chapter 11 - Scoping reviews. Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. Adelaide: JBI; 2020. doi: 10.46658/JBIMES-20-01.

Pollock D, Davies EL, Peters MDJ, et al. Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics. J Adv Nurs [Internet]. 2021 Apr 4;77(4):2102–13. doi: 10.1111/jan.14743.

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int J Surg [Internet]. 2021 Apr;88:105906. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906.

Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev [Internet]. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.

Downloads

Published

21-06-2024

Issue

Section

HEALTH PROFESSIONS

How to Cite

1.
Guardia de Barros T, Argollo Ferreira F, Sanches Rodrigues M, Antônio Moura Gonzalez L, de Souza Menezes JD, de Almeida Sasso LS, et al. Readiness for interprofessional learning among medical students: a scoping review protocol. Acta Biomed [Internet]. 2024 Jun. 21 [cited 2024 Jul. 25];95(3):e2024111. Available from: https://mattioli1885journals.com/index.php/actabiomedica/article/view/15729