Is fingerprint ridge density influenced by hand dimensions?

Main Article Content

Siddharatha Sharma
Kewal Krishan
Deepika Rani
Richa Mukhra
Tanuj Kanchan


Fingerprint ridge density, Hand dimensions, Identification, Biological anthropology


Background and objective:  Various aspects of fingerprint resarch were extensively explored in the past. However, the correlation between fingerprint ridge density and hand dimensions has not yet been documented. Therefore, the present study has investigated the relationship so that some conclusions regarding the association can be established.

Methods: The study included 500 subjects (250 males and 250 females) between the ages of 18 to 25 years who belonged to the Rajput community of the Shimla and Solan districts of Himachal Pradesh state of North India. The sexual dimorphism among the ridge count was examined using student’s t–test. The relationship of fingerprint ridge density with hand dimensions among both the sexes and pooled data was analyzed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient.

Results: All the fingers on both hands showed statistically significant sex differences. When all digits were considered together, the left little finger in males and right middle finger in females showed a weak but significant correlation with hand length while all the digits when considered in combination reported strong correlation hand length measurements. Similarly, right thumb showed significant correlation with hand breadth. All the ten digits showed highly significant correlation with hand breadth when pooled data was examined.

Conclusion: The ridge density correlates with the hand dimensions in the case of pooled data. This relationship can then be used to devise prediction equations for hand dimensions based on ridge density, or vice-versa for pooled data. The equations will also help in estimating hand dimensions based on ridge density and vice-versa.


Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 122 | PDF Downloads 94


1. Mulvihill JJ, Smith DW. The genesis of dermatoglyphics. J Pediatr 1969;75(4):579-89.
2. Babler WJ. Quantitative differences in morphogenesis of human epidermal ridges. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser 1979;15(6):199-208.
3. Dayal MR, Spocter MA, Bidmos MA. An assessment of sex using the skull of black South Africans by discriminant function analysis. HOMO 2008;59:209–221.
4. Meuwly D. Forensic Use of Fingerprints and Fingermarks. In: Li S, Jain A, editors. Encyclopedia of Biometrics. Boston, MA: Springer; 2014.
5. Wertheim K. Embryology and morphology of friction ridge skin. The Fingerprint Sourcebook; 2011. p. 103-126.
6. Gutiérrez-Redomero E, Alonso C, Romero E, Galera V. Variability of fingerprint ridge density in a sample of Spanish Caucasians and its application to sex determination. Forensic Sci Int 2008;180(1):17-22.
7. Nithin MD, Manjunatha B, Preethi DS, Balaraj BM. Gender differentiation by finger ridge count among South Indian population. J Forensic Leg Med 2011;18(2):79-81.
8. Krishan K, Kanchan T, Ngangom C. A study of sex differences in fingerprint ridge density in a North Indian young adult population. J Forensic Leg Med 2013;20(4):217-222.
9. Mundorff AZ, Bartelink EJ, Murad TA. Sexual dimorphism in finger ridge breadth measurements: A tool for Sex Estimation from fingerprints. J Forensic Sci 2014;59(4):891-897.
10. Rivalderia N, Sanchez-Andres A, Alonso-Rodriguez C, Dipierri JE, Gutierrez-Redomero E. Fingerprint ridge density in the Argentinean population and its application to sex inference: a comparative study. HOMO 2016;67:65–84.
11. Kanchan T, Rastogi P. Sex determination from hand dimensions of North and South Indians. J Forensic Sci 2009;54(3):546-50.
12. Jee SC, Bahn S, Yun MH. Determination of sex from various hand dimensions of Koreans. Forensic Sci Int 2015;257:521.e1-521.e10.
13. Cummins H, Midlo C. Finger prints, palms and soles: an introduction to dermatoglyphics. New York: Dover Publications;1961.
14. Singh IP, Bhasin MK, Anthropometry, Kamla-Raj Enterprises: Delhi;1968.
15. Acree MA. Is there a gender difference in fingerprint ridge density? Forensic Sci Int 1999;102(1):35-44.
16. Krishan K, Ghosh A, Kanchan T, Ngangom C, Sen J. Sex differences in fingerprint ridge density-causes and further observations. J Forensic Leg Med 2010;17(3):172-173.
17. Agnihotri AK, Jowaheer V, Allock A. An analysis of fingerprint ridge density in the Indo-Mauritian population and its application to gender determination. Med Sci Law 2012;52(3):143-147.
18. Kanchan T, Krishan K, Aparna KR, Shyamsundar S. Is there a sex difference in palm print ridge density?. Med Sci Law 2013;53(1):33-39.
19. Eshak GA, Zaher JF, Hasan EI, El-AzeemEwis AA. Sex identification from fingertip features in Egyptian population. J Forensic Leg Med 2013;20:46–50.
20. Kralik M, Novotny V. Epidermal ridge breadth: an indicator of age and sex in paleodermatoglyphics. Variability and Evolution 2003;11:5–30.

Most read articles by the same author(s)