Evaluation of the combined effect of mobility and seasonality on the COVID-19 pandemic: a Lombardy-based study

Main Article Content

Yuri Matteo Falzone
Luca Bosco
Giacomo Sferruzza
Tommaso Russo
Marco Vabanesi
Carlo Signorelli
Massimo Filippi

Keywords

SARS-CoV2, UV, environmental factors, transmissibility, GAM analysis

Abstract

Restrictions to human mobility had a significant role in limiting SARS-CoV-2 spread. It has been suggested that seasonality might affect viral transmissibility. Our study retrospectively investigates the combined effect that seasonal environmental factors and human mobility played on transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 in Lombardy, Italy, in 2020.


Environmental data were collected from accredited open-source web services. Aggregated mobility data for different points of interests were collected from Google Community Reports. The Reproduction number (Rt), based on the weekly counts of confirmed symptomatic COVID-19, non-imported cases, was used as a proxy for SARS-CoV-2 transmissibility. Assuming a non-linear correlation between selected variables, we used a Generalized Additive Model (GAM) to investigate with univariate and multivariate analyses the association between seasonal environmental factors (UV-index, temperature, humidity, and atmospheric pressure), location-specific mobility indices, and Rt.


UV-index was the most effective environmental variable in predicting Rt. An optimal two-week lag-effect between changes in explanatory variables and Rt was selected. The association between Rt variations and individually taken mobility indices differed: Grocery & Pharmacy, Transit Station and Workplaces displayed the best performances in predicting Rt when individually added to the multivariate model together with UV-index, accounting for 85.0%, 85.5% and 82.6% of Rt variance, respectively. According to our results, both seasonality and social interaction policies played a significant role in curbing the pandemic. Non-linear models including UV-index and location-specific mobility indices can predict a considerable amount of SARS-CoV-2 transmissibility in Lombardy during 2020, emphasizing the importance of social distancing policies to keep viral transmissibility under control, especially during colder months.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 65 | Supplementary file Downloads 0 PDF Downloads 23

References

1. WHO. Rolling updates on coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Available from: https://www. who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/events-as-they- happen (accessed December 20, 2020).
2. Remuzzi A, Remuzzi G. COVID-19 and Italy: what next? The Lancet. 2020;395:1225–8.
3. Google - COVID-19 Community Mobility Reports. Available from: https://www.google.com/covid19/mobility/ (accessed December 20, 2020).
4. Badr HS, Du H, Marshall M, Dong E, Squire MM, Gardner LM. Association between mobility patterns and COVID-19 transmission in the USA: a mathematical modelling study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2020;20:1247–54.
5. Li Y, Campbell H, Kulkarni D, Harpur A, Nundy M, Wang X, et al. The temporal association of introducing and lifting non-pharmaceutical interventions with the time-varying reproduction number (R) of SARS-CoV-2: a modelling study across 131 countries. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2020;S1473309920307854.
6. Rader B, Scarpino SV, Nande A, Hill AL, Adlam B, Reiner RC, et al. Crowding and the shape of COVID-19 epidemics. Nat Med. 2020;26:1829–34.
7. Cacciapaglia G, Cot C, Sannino F. Second wave COVID-19 pandemics in Europe: a temporal playbook. Sci Rep. 2020;10:15514.
8. Yap TF, Liu Z, Shveda RA, Preston DJ. A predictive model of the temperature-dependent inactivation of coronaviruses. Appl Phys Lett. 2020;117:060601.
9. Schuit M, Ratnesar-Shumate S, Yolitz J, Williams G, Weaver W, Green B, et al. Airborne SARS-CoV-2 Is Rapidly Inactivated by Simulated Sunlight. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2020;222:564–71.
10. Goh GK-M, Dunker AK, Foster JA, Uversky VN. Shell disorder analysis predicts greater resilience of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) outside the body and in body fluids. Microb Pathog. 2020;144:104177.
11. Bashir MF, Ma B, Bilal, Komal B, Bashir MA, Tan D, et al. Correlation between climate indicators and COVID-19 pandemic in New York, USA. Science of The Total Environment. 2020;728:138835.
12. Ma Y, Zhao Y, Liu J, He X, Wang B, Fu S, et al. Effects of temperature variation and humidity on the death of COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. Science of The Total Environment. 2020;724:138226.
13. Tosepu R, Gunawan J, Effendy DS, Ahmad LOAI, Lestari H, Bahar H, et al. Correlation between weather and Covid-19 pandemic in Jakarta, Indonesia. Science of The Total Environment. 2020;725:138436.
14. Isaia G, Diémoz H, Maluta F, Fountoulakis I, Ceccon D, di Sarra A, et al. Does solar ultraviolet radiation play a role in COVID-19 infection and deaths? An environmental ecological study in Italy. Sci Total Environ. 2020;143757.
15. Carlson CJ, Gomez ACR, Bansal S, Ryan SJ. Misconceptions about weather and seasonality must not misguide COVID-19 response. Nat Commun. 2020;11:4312.
16. Cori A, Ferguson NM, Fraser C, Cauchemez S. A New Framework and Software to Estimate Time-Varying Reproduction Numbers During Epidemics. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2013;178:1505–12.
17. Guzzetta G, Merler S. Stime della trasmissibilità di SARS-CoV-2 in Italia [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://www.epicentro.iss.it/coronavirus/open-data/rt.pdf
18. Zempila M-M, van Geffen JHGM, Taylor M, Fountoulakis I, Koukouli M-E, van Weele M, et al. TEMIS UV product validation using NILU-UV ground-based measurements in Thessaloniki, Greece. Atmos Chem Phys. 2017;17:7157–74.
19. The Royal Society. Reproduction number (R) and growth rate (r) of the COVID-19 epidemic in the UK: methods of estimation, data sources, causes of heterogeneity, and use as a guide in policy formulation [Internet]. Available from: https://royalsociety.org/-/media/policy/projects/set-c/set-covid-19-R-estimates.pdf?la=en-GB&hash=FDFFC11968E5D247D8FF641930680BD6 (accessed December 20, 2020).
20. The Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center (CRC) [Internet]. Available from: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html (accessed December 20, 2020).
21. Mallapaty S. Why COVID outbreaks look set to worsen this winter. Nature. 2020;586:653–653.
22. Carleton T, Cornetet J, Huybers P, Meng KC, Proctor J. Global evidence for ultraviolet radiation decreasing COVID-19 growth rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021;118:e2012370118.
23. Herman J, Biegel B, Huang L. Inactivation times from 290 to 315 nm UVB in sunlight for SARS coronaviruses CoV and CoV-2 using OMI satellite data for the sunlit Earth. Air Qual Atmos Health [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Jan 21]; Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11869-020-00927-2
24. Ratnesar-Shumate S, Williams G, Green B, Krause M, Holland B, Wood S, et al. Simulated Sunlight Rapidly Inactivates SARS-CoV-2 on Surfaces. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2020;222:214–22.
25. Prietl B, Treiber G, Pieber T, Amrein K. Vitamin D and Immune Function. Nutrients. 2013;5:2502–21.
26. Sehra ST, Salciccioli JD, Wiebe DJ, Fundin S, Baker JF. Maximum Daily Temperature, Precipitation, Ultraviolet Light, and Rates of Transmission of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in the United States. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2020;ciaa681.
27. Cacho PM, Hernández JL, López-Hoyos M, Martínez-Taboada VM. Can climatic factors explain the differences in COVID-19 incidence and severity across the Spanish regions?: An ecological study. Environ Health. 2020;19:106.
28. Kraemer MUG, Yang C-H, Gutierrez B, Wu C-H, Klein B, Pigott DM, et al. The effect of human mobility and control measures on the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Science. 2020;368:493–7.
29. Sulyok M, Walker M. Community movement and COVID-19: a global study using Google’s Community Mobility Reports. Epidemiol Infect. 2020;148:e284.
30. Adam D. A guide to R — the pandemic’s misunderstood metric. Nature. 2020;583:346–8.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >>