Suprapatellar nail removal after suprapatellar nailing of the tibia: it could work! : Surgical technique and small case series

Suprapatellar nail removal after suprapatellar nailing of the tibia: it could work!

Surgical technique and small case series

Authors

  • Luigi Branca Vergano U.O. Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Ospedale M. Bufalini, Cesena (FC)
  • Enrico Francesco Florio
  • Vito Prezioso
  • Mauro Monesi
  • Stefano Landi

Keywords:

suprapatellar nailing, infrapatellar nailing, nail removal, hardware removal

Abstract

Background and aim of the work: Intramedullary nailing is a fundamental tool for the treatment of meta-diaphyseal tibia fractures. While, in the past, the infrapatellar approach was the only one available, over the last few years, an alternative approach has been developed: the suprapatellar tibial nailing. This technique has shown some advantages over the other one. However, as the most recent method has become increasingly more common, concerns have been put forward about the possibility to remove the nail using only the infrapatellar approach, thus incising the previously unviolated patellar tendon. The aim of our study is to describe the technique and the results of a suprapatellar approach to remove the nail.

Methods: We describe the surgical technique used to remove the tibial nail via the suprapatellar approach. We analyze a small case series of 12 patients who underwent the operation of nail removal, analyzing operation time, intraoperative and/or postoperative complications and clinical outcomes.

Results: The mean duration of the operation was 39.8 minutes. The difference between the two values of the Lysholm score (pre- and postoperative) in each patient was not statistically significant, ranging between -2 to +4 points. We did not observe any intraoperative or postoperative complications.

Conclusions: After suprapatellar nailing of the tibia, it is possible to remove the nail using the same suprapatellar approach with a safe, easy and reproducible technique. The clinical results observed in our case series show excellent outcomes in terms of absence of complications and good functional knee score.

References

Alho A, Ekeland A, Strømsøe K, Follerås G, Thoresen BO. Locked intramedullary nailing for displaced tibial shaft fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990 Sep;72(5):805-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.72B5.2211761. Erratum in: J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991 Jan;73(1):181. PMID: 2211761.

Keating JF, O'Brien PI, Blachut PA, Meek RN, Broekhuyse HM. Reamed interlocking intramedullary nailing of open fractures of the tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997 May;(338):182-91. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199705000-00025. PMID: 9170379.

Wiss DA, Stetson WB. Unstable fractures of the tibia treated with a reamed intramedullary interlocking nail. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Jun;(315):56-63. PMID: 7634687.Articolo generale su chiodi tibia

Brink O. Suprapatellar nailing of tibial fractures: surgical hints. Curr Orthop Pract. 2016 Jan;27(1):107-112. doi: 10.1097/BCO.0000000000000308. Epub 2015 Dec 30. PMID: 27340503; PMCID: PMC4894781.

Allen JC Jr, Lindsey RW, Hipp JA, Gugala Z, Rianon N, LeBlanc A. The effect of retained intramedullary nails on tibial bone mineral density. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008 Jul;23(6):839-43. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.02.003. Epub 2008 Mar 25. PMID: 18367297.

Noia G, Fulchignoni C, Marinangeli M, Maccauro G, Tamburelli FC, De Santis V et al. Intramedullary nailing through a suprapatellar approach. Evaluation of clinical outcome after removal of the device using the infrapatellar approach. Acta Biomed. 2018 Dec 20;90(1-S):130-135. doi: 10.23750/abm.v90i1-S.8014. PMID: 30715011; PMCID: PMC6503400.

Obremskey WT, Cutrera N, Kidd CM; Southeastern Fracture Consortium. A prospective multi-center study of intramedullary nailing vs casting of stable tibial shaft fractures. J Orthop Traumatol. 2017 Mar;18(1):69-76. doi: 10.1007/s10195-016-0429-4. Epub 2016 Oct 21. PMID: 27770336; PMCID: PMC5311003

Lu K, Gao YJ, Li C, Wu ZQ, Yin Y, Wang HZ. Semi-extended intramedullary nailing of the tibia using an infrapatellar approach: a retrospective cohort study. Int Orthop. 2021 Oct;45(10):2719-2726. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-04974-x. Epub 2021 Feb 9. PMID: 33559052.

Franke J, Hohendorff B, Alt V, Thormann U, Schnettler R. Suprapatellar nailing of tibial fractures-Indications and technique. Injury. 2016 Feb;47(2):495-501. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.023. Epub 2015 Oct 20. PMID: 26553427.

Xu H, Gu F, Xin J, Tian C, Chen F. A meta-analysis of suprapatellar versus infrapatellar intramedullary nailing for the treatment of tibial shaft fractures. Heliyon. 2019;5(9):e02199. Published 2019 Sep 6. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02199

Yang L, Sun Y, Li G. Comparison of suprapatellar and infrapatellar intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Jun 14;13(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0846-6. PMID: 29898758; PMCID: PMC6001044

Tornetta P 3rd, Collins E. Semiextended position of intramedullary nailing of the proximal tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Jul;(328):185-9. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199607000-00029. PMID: 8653954.

Kubiak EN, Widmer BJ, Horwitz DS. Extra-articular technique for semiextended tibial nailing. Journal of orthopaedic trauma. 2010;24(11):704-8

Stella M, Santolini E, Felli L, Santolini F, Horwitz DS. Semiextended Tibial Nail Insertion Using an Extraarticular Lateral Parapatellar Approach: A 24-Month Follow-up Prospective Cohort Study. J Orthop Trauma. 2019 Oct;33(10):e366-e371. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001554. PMID: 31568045.

Jakma T, Reynders-Frederix P, Rajmohan R. Insertion of intramedullary nails from the suprapatellar pouch for proximal tibial shaft fractures. A technical note. Acta Orthop Belg. 2011 Dec;77(6):834-7. PMID: 22308632.

Gelbke MK, Coombs D, Powell S, DiPasquale TG. Suprapatellar versus infra-patellar intramedullary nail insertion of the tibia: a cadaveric model for comparison of patellofemoral contact pressures and forces. J Orthop Trauma. 2010 Nov;24(11):665-71. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181f6c001. PMID: 20926959.

Sanders RW, DiPasquale TG, Jordan CJ, Arrington JA, Sagi HC. Semiextended intramedullary nailing of the tibia using a suprapatellar approach: radiographic results and clinical outcomes at a minimum of 12 months follow-up. J Orthop Trauma. 2014 May;28(5):245-55. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000082. PMID: 24694557.

Beltran MJ, Collinge CA, Patzkowski JC, et al. Intra-articular risk of suprapatellar nailing. Am J Orthop. 2012; 12:546--550.

Tornetta PIII, Riina J, Geller J, et al. Intraarticular anatomic risks of tibial nailing. J Orthop Trauma. 1999; 13:247--251.

Ryan SP1, Steen B, Tornetta PIII. Semi-extended nailing of metaphyseal tibia fractures: alignment and incidence of postoperative knee pain. J Orthop Trauma. 2014; 28:263--269.

Sanders RW, DiPasquale TG, Jordan CJ, et al. Semiextended intramedullary nailing of the tibia using a suprapatellar approach: radiographic results and clinical outcomes at a minimum of 12 months follow-up. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28(Suppl 8):S29--S39.

Gaines RJ, Rockwood J, Garland J, et al. Comparison of insertional trauma between suprapatellar and infrapatellar portals for tibial nailing. Orthopedics. 2013; 36:e1155--e1158.

Rutkow IM: Orthopaedic operations in the United States, 1979 through 1983. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986;68: 716-719.

Bostman O, Pihlajamaki H: Routine implant removal after fracture surgery: A potentially reducible consumer of hospital resources in trauma units. J Trauma 1996; 41:846-849

Boerger TO, Patel G, Murphy JP. Is routine removal of intramedullary nails justified. Injury. 1999 Mar;30(2):79-81. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(98)00200-9. PMID: 10476274.

Busam ML, Esther RJ, Obremskey WT. Hardware removal: indications and expectations. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006 Feb;14(2):113-20. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200602000-00006. PMID: 16467186.

Rohling ML, Binder LM. Money matters: a meta-analytic review of the association between financial compensation and the experience and treatment of chronic pain. Health Psychol 1995;14:537-47

Sidky A, Buckley RE. Hardware removal after tibial fracture has healed. Can J Surg 2008; 51: 263-8.

Court-Brown CM, Gustilo T, Shaw AD. Knee pain after intramedullary tibial nailing: Its incidence aetiology and outcome. J. Orthop. Trauma 1997;11:103.

Keating JF, Orfaly R, O'Brien PJ. Knee pain after tibial nailing. J. Orthop. Trauma 1997;11:10

Braten M, Terjesen T, Rossvoll I. Femoral shaft fractures treated by intramedullary nailing. A follow up study focusing on problems related to the method. Injury 1995;26:379

Seyhan M, Guler O, Mahirogullari M, Donmez F, Gereli A, Mutlu S. Complications during removal of stainless steel versus titanium nails used for intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal fractures of the tibia. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2018 Jan 9;26:38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.12.012. PMID: 29348913; PMCID: PMC5767899.

Leary J, Werger M, Sagebien C. A novel technique for percutaneous removal of a suprapatellar intramedullary nail. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2013 Mar;42(3):136-40. PMID: 23527331.

Downloads

Published

10-03-2022

How to Cite

1.
Branca Vergano L, Florio EF, Prezioso V, Monesi M, Landi S. Suprapatellar nail removal after suprapatellar nailing of the tibia: it could work! : Surgical technique and small case series. Acta Biomed [Internet]. 2022 Mar. 10 [cited 2024 Jul. 14];92(S3):e2021559. Available from: https://mattioli1885journals.com/index.php/actabiomedica/article/view/12548