External fixation can be an option for proximal humerus fractures Neer 3-4

Tommaso Maluta; Andrea Amarossi; Andrea Dorigotti; Francesco Bagnis; Elena Manuela Samaila; Lapo De Luca; Lorenzo Pezze; Bruno Magnan

doi:10.23750/abm.v91i14-S.10979

External fixation can be an option for proximal humerus fractures Neer 3-4

Authors

Tommaso Maluta
Andrea Amarossi University of Verona
Andrea Dorigotti University of Verona
Francesco Bagnis University of Verona
Elena Manuela Samaila University of Verona
Lapo De Luca APSS Trento, Ospedale Santa Chiara
Lorenzo Pezze APSS Trento, Ospedale Santa Chiara
Bruno Magnan University of Verona

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i14-S.10979

Keywords:

External Fixation; Proximal Humeral fractures; Neer classification.

Abstract

Background: Proximal humeral fractures (PHF) account for 4-6% of all fractures and 25% of humeral fractures. While conservative treatment is the gold standard for simple fractures, there is no consensus about the best treatment choice for complex PHF in the elderly.

Recently a new external fixator was introduced in clinical practice for treatment of complex PHF. Aim of the study was to evaluate the functional results of this therapeutic approach.

Methods: Data were retrospectively analyzed. Inclusion criteria were: three- and four- parts PHF according to Neer, treatment with closed reduction and external fixation, normal Abbreviated Mini Mental Test score, independence in the daily living, non-pathological fracture, glenohumeral joint with moderate osteoarthritic changes and availability of clinical and radiological follow-up. For each patient demographic data, comorbidities, surgery time and estimated blood loss were recorded. Clinical and radiological evaluation were performed at 1, 2, 6, 12 months.

Results: 17 patients were enrolled. Mean age was 69.7 years. Fractures were classified according to Neer as type III in 10 cases and type IV in 7 cases. The mean operating time was 22 minutes. Mean Constant score value at follow up was 74 ±11,52 at 2 months, 82 ± 11,16 at 6 months and 85 ± 9,86 at 12 months.

Conclusion: These preliminary results show that the studied system is easy to use, minimally invasive, effective in reducing surgical and hospitalization time. The results in terms of functional recovery are encouraging, showing a reduced number of complications.

References

Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury, 2006, p. 37: 691–697.

Horak J., Nilsson BE. Epidemiology of fracture of the upper end of humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1975, p. 112: 250 -253.

John-Erik Bell, Brian C Leung, Kevin F Spratt, et al. Trends and Variation in Incidence, Surgical Treatment, and Repeat Surgery of Proximal Humeral Fractures in the Elderly. s.l. : J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2011 Jan 19, Vol. 93 (2), 121-31.

Kannus P, Niemi S, Sievänen H, Parkkari J. Stabilized Incidence in Proximal Humeral Fractures of Elderly Women: Nationwide Statistics From Finland in 1970-2015. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 2017, p. 1;72(10): 1390-1393.

Baron JA, Barrett JA, Karagas MR. The epidemiology of peripheral fractures. Bone, 1996, p. 18: 209S–213S.

Bogner R, Hubner C, Matis N, Auffarth A, Lederer S, Resch H. Minimallyinvasive treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2008 Dec, p. 90(12): 1602-7.

Lauritzen JB, Schwarz P, Lund B, McNair P, Transbol I. Changing incidence and residual lifetime risk of common osteoporosis-related fractures. Osteoporos Int, 1993, p. 3(3): 127–132.

Lind T, Kroner K, Jensen J. The epidemiology of fractures of the proximal humerus. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 1989, p. 108(5): 285–287.

Roux A, Decroocq L, El Batti S, Bonnevialle N, Moineau G, Trojani C, et al. Epidemiology of proximal humerus fractures managed in a trauma center. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2012, p. 98: 715–719.

Seeley DG, Browner WS, Nevitt MC, Genant HK, Scott JC, Cummings SR. Which fractures are associated with low appendicular bone mass in elderly women? The study of osteoporotic fractures research group. Ann Intern Med, 1991, p. 115(11): 837–842.

Rose SH, Melton III LJ, Morrey BF. Epidemiologic features of humeral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1982, p. 168: 24-30.

Kim SH, Szabo RM, Marder RA. Epidemiology of humerus fractures in the United States: Nationwide emergency department sample. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 2012, p. 64(3): 407–414.

Kristiansen B, Barfod G, Bredesen J, et al. Epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand., 1987, p. 58(1): 75–77.

Röderer G, Abouelsoud M, Gebhard F, et al. Minimally invasive application of the noncontact-bridging (NCB) plate to the proximal humerus: An anatomical study. J Orthop Trauma, 2007, p. 21(9): 621–627.

Keser S, Bölu˝kbasi S, Bayar A, et al. Proximal humeral fractures with minimal displacement treated conservatively. Int Orthop, 2004, p. 28(4): 231–234.

Koval KJ, Gallagher MA, Marsicano JG, et al. Functional outcome after minimally displaced fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am., 1997, p. 79(2): 203–207.

Tejwani NC, Liporace F, Walsh M, et al. Functional outcome following one-part proximal humeral fractures: A prospective study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2008, p. 17(2): 216–129.

Wang MQ, Youssef T, Smerdely P. Incidence and outcomes of humeral fractures in the older person. s.l. : Osteoporos Int, 2018.

Bernstein J, Adler LM, Blank JE, Dalsey RM, Williams GR, Iannotti JP. Evaluation of the Neer system of classification of proximal humeral fractures with computerized tomographic scans and plain radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1996, p. 78: 1371-5.

Anakwenze OA, Zoller S, Ahmad CS, Levine WN. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2014, p. Apr;23(4): e73-80.

Chun YM, Kim DS, Lee DH, Shin SJ. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for four-part proximal humerus fracture in elderly patients: can a healed tuberosity improve the functional outcomes? . J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2017 ,p. Jul;26(7): 1216-21.

Grubhofer F, Wieser K, Meyer DC, et al. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for acute head-splitting, 3- and 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly . J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2016 , p. Oct;25(10): 1690-8.

Williams GR, Jr., Wong KL. Two-part and three-part fractures: open reduction and internal fixation versus closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. Orthop Clin North Am, 2000 , p. Jan;31(1): 1-21.

Fattoretto D, Borgo A, Iacobellis. The treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures: analysis of the results of 55 cases treated with PHILOS plate. s.l. : Musculoskelet Surg , 2016 , Vol. 100(2): 109-14.

Blonna D, Castoldi F, Scelsi M, Rossi R, Falcone G, Assom M. The hybrid technique: Potential reduction in complications related to pins mobilization in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. s.l. : J Shoulder Elb Surg , 2010, Vol. 19: 1218–29.

Gerber C, Werner CML, Vienne P. Internal fixation of complex fractures of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2004, p. 86: 848–55.

Solberg BD, Moon CN, Franco DP, Paiement GD. Surgical Treatment of Three and Four-Part Proximal Humeral Fractures. J Bone Jt Surg, 2009, p. 91: 1689.

Wijgman AJ, Roolker W, Patt TW, Raaymakers ELFB, Marti RK. Open reduction and internal fixation of three and four-part fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. s.l. : J Bone Joint Surg Am , 2002, Vol. 84–A: 1919–25.

B. Kristiansen. External fixation of proximal humerus fracture. Clinical and cadaver study of pinning technique. Acta Orthop Scand, 1987, p. 58: 645–8.

Cuomo F et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of two- and three-part displaced surgical neck fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 1992, p. 1: 287-95.

D’Ambrosi R, Palumbo F, Barbato A, Facchini RM. A prospective study for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures with the Galaxy Fixation System. s.l. : Musculoskelet Surg , 2017, Vol. 101: 11–7.

Kazmers, Nikolas H., Fragomen, Austin T. e Rozbruch, S. Robert. Prevention of pin site infection in external fixation: a review of the literature. s.l. : Strat Traum Limb Recon, 2016 Aug, Vol. 11(2): 75–85.

Hodkinson, H. M. Evaluation of a mental test score for assessment of mental impairment in the elderly. s.l. : Age and Ageing, November 1972, Vol. 1, Issue 4, Pages 233–238

Constant CR, Mourley AHG. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop 1987;214:160-4.

Bell J-E, Leung BC, Spratt KF, et al. Trends and variation in incidence, surgical treatment, and repeat surgery of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly. J Bone Jt Surg Am, 2011, p. 93: 121–31.

Charles S Neer. Four-segment Classification of Proximal Humeral Fractures: Purpose and Reliable Use. s.l. : J Shoulder Elbow Surg, Jul-Aug 2002, Vol. 11 (4), 389-400.

Gerber C, Schneeberger AG, Vinh TS. The arterial vascularization of the humeral head. An anatomical study. J Bone Jt Surg , 1990, p. 72: 1486–94.

Hertel R, Hempfing A, Stiehler M, Leunig M. Predictors of humeral head ischemia after intracapsular fracture of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elb Surg, 2004, p. 13: 427–33.

Misra A, Kapur R, Maffulli N. Complex proximal humeral fractures in adults - a systematic review of management. s.l. : Injury , 2001, Vol. 32: 363–72.

Handoll HHG, Brorson S. Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults. s.l.:Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015, Vol. CD000434.

Agudelo J, Schürmann M, Stahel P, et al. Analysis of Efficacy and Failure in Proximal Humerus Fractures Treated With Locking Plates . s.l. : J Orthop Trauma, 2007, Vol. 21: 676–81.

Hirschmann MT, Fallegger B, Amsler F, Regazzoni P, Gross T. Clinical Longer-Term Results After Internal Fixation of Proximal Humerus Fractures With a Locking Compression Plate (PHILOS). s.l. : J Orthop Trauma, 2011, Vol. 25: 286–93.

Zhang J, Ebraheim N, Lause GE. Surgical treatment of proximal humeral fracture with external ﬁxator. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2012, p. Jul;21(7): 882-6.

Park J, Jeong SY. Complications and outcomes of minimally invasive percuta-neous plating for proximal humeral fractures . Clin Orthop Surg., 2014, p. Jun;6(2): 146-52.

Kristiansen B, Kofoed H. Transcutaneous reduction and external fixation of displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. A controlled clinical trial. s.l. : J Bone Joint Surg Br , 1988, Vol. 70: 821–4.

Wang MQ, Youssef T, Smerdely P. Incidence and outcomes of humeral fractures in the older person. Osteoporos Int, 2018.

Lind T, Krøner K, Jensen J. The epidemiology of fractures of the proximal humerus. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg , 1989, p. 108: 285–287.

Court-Brown CM, Garg A, McQueen MM. The translated two-part fracture of the proximal humerus. Epidemiology and outcome in the older patient. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2001, p. 83(6): 799–804.