Main Article Content
Survey, Resident, Gynecology, Obestetrics
Purpose: The present study aims to investigate the number of surgical procedures performed by Italian residents and their confidence to carry out different surgeries in obstetrics and gynecology.
Methods: The present study is a national survey including all Italian gynecology and obstetrics senior residents. A questionnaire including 25 questions was provided. The free Google Forms site was used to create the survey. The study was conducted from April to October 2019.
The survey started from the University Hospital of Parma, a tertiary hospital, and was sent to all the Italian post-graduation medical school in gynecology and obstetrics. An e-mail was sent to all representative residents in gynecology and obstetrics in Italy, then forwarded to all the senior residents.
Results: Of the 555 residents enrolled, 100 joined the survey (18.2%). The analysis of the different procedures performed by residents has shown that 53%, 57%, and 77% of the residents had never performed a laparotomic, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomy, respectively. The analysis of cesarean section skills has shown that 1% of residents had never performed any simple cesarean section, and 6% of residents had never performed any complex cesarean section. Fifty-two doctors in training had never performed an operative vaginal delivery. Seventy-three and ninety-three residents performed more than thirty uterine curettages and sutures of 1st or 2nd degree tears, respectively.
Conclusions: In Italy, senior residents are generally confident with the low-complexity procedures and also with complex cesarean sections. The number of Italian residents confident to perform a hysterectomy is poor.
2. Vaughan, M. H. et al. Validation of the Simulated Vaginal Hysterectomy Trainer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Sep - Oct;25(6)1101-1106. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2018.02.022
3. CREOG Educational Objectives: Core Curriculum in Obstetrics and Gynecology. In: Gynecology CfREiOa, ed. 11th ed.Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2016:48.
4. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Minimum thresholds for obstetrics and gynecology procedures. https://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/ 0/PFAssets/ProgramResources/220_Ob_Gyn%20 Minimum_Numbers_Announcment.pdf. Accessed October 27, 2019.
5. Gupta, N., Dragovic, K., Trester, R. & Blankstein, J. The Changing Scenario of Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Training. J Gr. Med Educ. 2015 Sep; 7(3) 401–406. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-14-00730.1
6. Smith, A. L., Schneider, K. M. & Berens, P. D. Survey of obstetrics and gynecology residents’ training and opinions on robotic surgery. J Robot Surg. 2010 May;4(1)23-7. doi:10.1007/s11701-010-0176-0
7. De Win, G., Everaerts, W., De Ridder, D. & Peeraer, G. Laparoscopy training in Belgium: results from a nationwide survey, in urology, gynecology, and general surgery residents. Adv Med Educ Pr. 2015 Jan 30;655-63. doi:10.2147/amep.s75747
8. Gac, M. M. et al. Gynecology-obstetric resident surgery training: a national evaluation. Arch Gynecol Obs. 2019 Nov;300(5)1353-1366. doi:10.1007/s00404-019-05284-9
9. Mavrova, R. et al. Learning curves for laparoscopic hysterectomy after implementation of minimally invasive surgery. Int J Gynaecol Obs. 2016 Aug;134(2)225-30. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.01.017
10. Soergel, P., Jensen, T., Makowski, L., Von Kaisenberg, C. & Hillemanns, P. Characterisation of the learning curve of caesarean section. Arch Gynecol Obs. 2012 Jul;286(1)29-33. doi:10.1007/s00404-012-2230-9
11. Google. https://www.https://www.google.it/intl/it/forms/about. Accessed October 30, 2019.
12. Silvestre, J., Lin, I. C., Levin, L. S. & Chang, B. Variability in Resident Operative Hand Experience by Specialty. Hand (N Y). 2018 Jan; 13(1) 103–107. doi:10.1177/1558944716677537
13. Ahmed, N. et al. A systematic review of the effects of resident duty hour restrictions in surgery: Impact on resident wellness, training, and patient outcomes. Ann Surg. 2014 Jun; 259(6) 1041–1053. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000000595
14. Hwang, H. Does general surgery residency prepare surgeons for community practice in British Columbia. Can J Surg. 2009 Jun; 52(3) 196–200.
15. Washburn, E. E., Cohen, S. L., Manoucheri, E., Zurawin, R. K. & Einarsson, J. I. Trends in reported resident surgical experience in hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6)1067-70. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2014.05.005
16. Petrikovets, A. et al. National survey of urogynecological practice patterns among United States OB/GYN oral board examinees in different practice settings. Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Jul;30(7)1153-1161. doi:10.1007/s00192-018-3636-0
17. Burkett D, Horwitz J, Kennedy V, et al. Assessing current trends in resident hysterectomy training. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2011 Sep;17(5)210-4.
18. Turner LC, Shepherd JP, Wang L, et al. Hysterectomy surgery trends: a more accurate depiction of the last decade? Am J Obs. Gynecol. 2013 Apr; 208(4) 277.e1–277.e7.
19. Orhan, A. et al. Laparoscopic hysterectomy trends in challenging cases (1995–2018). J Gynecol Obs. Hum Reprod. 2019 Jul 26. doi:10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.06.007
20. Kumar, P., Kapur, K., Bhat, P. M. & Karkhanis, N. Learning curve of laparoscopic hysterectomy in a zonal hospital setting: a retrospective analysis of 102 cases operated by a single surgeon. Int J Reprod Contracept Obs. Gynecol. 2017 Jun;6(6)2479-2484 doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20172335
21. Ghomi, A., Littman, P., Prasad, A. & Einarsson, J. I. Assessing the learning curve for laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. JSLS. 2007 Apr-Jun; 11(2) 190–194. doi:10.1016/s1074-3804(02)80206-7
22. Visser, G. H. A. et al. FIGO position paper: how to stop the caesarean section epidemic. Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155)1286-1287. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32113-5
23. Sentilhes, L. et al. Outcomes of operative vaginal delivery managed by residents under supervision and attending obstetricians: a prospective cross-sectional study. Am J Obs. Gynecol. 2019 Jul;221(1)59.e1-59.e15. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.044
24. Bofill, J. A. et al. Operative vaginal delivery: A survey of fellows of ACOG. Obs. Gynecol. 1996 Dec;88(6)1007-10. doi:10.1016/S0029-7844(96)00328-6
25. Keriakos, R., Sugumar, S. & Hilal, N. Instrumental vaginal delivery-back to basics. J Obs. Gynaecol. 2013 Nov;33(8)781-6. doi:10.3109/01443615.2013.813917
26. Murphy, D. J. Medico-legal considerations and operative vaginal delivery. Best Pr. Res Clin Obs. Gynaecol. 2019 Apr;56114-124. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.01.012
27. Macedonia, C. R., Gherman, R. B. & Satin, A. J. Simulation laboratories for training in obstetrics and gynecology. Obs. Gynecol. 2003 Aug;102(2)388-92. doi:10.1016/S0029-7844(03)00483-6
28. Goff, B. A. Training and assessment in gynaecologic surgery: The role of simulation. Best Pr. Res Clin Obs. Gynaecol. 2010 Dec;24(6)759-66. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2010.03.006
29. Nezhat, C. & Lakhi, N. Learning Experiences in Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery. Best Pr. Res Clin Obs. Gynaecol. 2016 Aug;3520-9 doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.11.009
30. Wanzel, K. R., Ward, M. & Reznick, R. K. Teaching the surgical craft: From selection to certification. Curr Probl Surg. 2002 Jun;39(6)573-659. doi:10.1067/mog.2002.123481
31. Dubuisson, J. et al. Do laparoscopic pelvic trainer exercises improve residents’ surgical skills? A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obs. Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Nov;206177-180. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.09.026
32. Rogers, R. M. & Julian, T. M. Training the gynecologic surgeon. Obs. Gynecol. 2005 Jan;105(1)197-200. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000150578.60931.a6
33. Jajja, M. R. et al. Can a Structured, Video-Based Cadaver Curriculum Demonstrating Proficiency Enhance Resident Operative Autonomy? J Surg Educ. 2019 Sep 20. pii S1931-7204(19)30149-7 doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.08.004