The “Two Camps” Competition: the 1894 Hong Kong Plague in Two English Medical Journals
Keywords:
Alexandre Yersin, James Lowson, James Cantlie, Shibasaburō Kitasato, the British Medical Journal, The Lancet, the Plague BacillusAbstract
Scholars have paid much attention to discussing who was first to discover the plague bacillus in 1894, Kitasato Shibasaburō or Alexandre Yersin. This paper, using publications as they appeared chronologically in The Lancet and the British Medical Journal (BMJ), demonstrates that two camps competed with each other to report the news and findings, as well as to express their standpoints. One camp included Shibasaburō Kitasato, James Lowson and The Lancet, while the other included Alexandre Yersin, James Centlie and the BMJ. This paper concludes that when discussing who was first to discover the plague bacillus, the historical facts should be made clear, especially the “two camps” competition. The roles and publications of James Lowson and James Cantlie in the controversial debate on the discovery of the plague bacillus should not be neglected.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Transfer of Copyright and Permission to Reproduce Parts of Published Papers.
Authors retain the copyright for their published work. No formal permission will be required to reproduce parts (tables or illustrations) of published papers, provided the source is quoted appropriately and reproduction has no commercial intent. Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.