Salvatore Galdy
Unit of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Milan, Italy
Luigi Funicelli
Division of Radiology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Milan, Italy
Andrea Luciani
U.O. Oncologia Medica, A.O. San Paolo-Polo Universitario, Milan, Italy
Dario Giuffrida
U.O. Oncologia Medica, Istituto Oncologico del Mediterraneo (IOM), Viagrande (CT), Italy
Francesca Spada
Unit of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Milan, Italy
Chiara Alessandra Cella
Unit of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Milan, Italy
Sabina Murgioni
Unit of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Milan, Italy
Anna Maria Frezza
Unit of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Milan, Italy
Nicola Fazio
Unit of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Milan, Italy
Keywords
gastroenteropancreatic, neuroendocrine carcinomas, oxaliplatin, second-line chemotherapy
Abstract
Patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEP-NECs) are generally treated with a first-line chemotherapy including cisplatin and etoposide, in the absence of randomized trials. No specific second-line regimen has been reported. According to some retrospective data, platinum rechallenge could be considered in GEP-NECs. However, in view of the considerable platinoid toxicity profile, it would be advisable to consider an analogue thereof in order to minimize cumulative toxicity. We present the clinical history of three metastatic GEP-NEC patients who underwent oxaliplatin-based second-line chemotherapy after progression on platinum-based first-line chemotherapy.
Abstract