The situation of work-related COVID-19 infection and Occupational Health and Safety measures in Thailand

Main Article Content

Somkiat Siriruttanapruk
Chalo Sansilapin
Rachaneekorn Weeracharoen
Chuleekorn Tanathitikorn
Walairat Chaifoo


work-related COVID-19 infection, occupational health and safety, Thailand, enterprises


Introduction: The pandemic of COVID-19 infection is the worst public health problem worldwide. Globally, most of cases are among working population. The aims of this study are to describe the situation of work-related disease in Thailand and currently implemented preventive and control measures.

Methods: The data from the Situation Awareness Team under the Department of Disease Control (DDC) were collected and analysed in September 2020. The Monitoring and Evaluation Team under DDC also conducted a rapid survey to identify any measures enterprises had implemented to protect their employees from the disease. The checklists were applied from the ILO guideline. The survey was conducted via an on-line questionnaire using Google Form and sent to enterprises and the network of safety officers during 13th -17th April 2020. Fisher’s Exact test with p-value was used to compare the percentage of enterprises reported implementation of measures.

Results: Until the end of September, total cumulative number of COVID-19 infection in Thailand were 3,519 cases (approximately 5.29 per 100,000 populations) and 2,445 cases (69.5%) were domestic infection. Among this group, 2,258 persons (92.4%) were working population, aged 18-60 years. 484 domestic cases (21.4%) were classified as work-related COVID-19 infection. The highest number of work-related infection (122 cases) were among workers who worked in entertainment sector. Regarding the calculation for proportions of number of work-related infection and total number of infected cases in each occupation, almost drivers got infection from their jobs. Other high risk occupations included masseurs (90.9%), flight attendants (87.5%), priests (all religions) (80.0%), and airport staff (78.6%). Regarding the rapid survey, 101 samples responded. Almost all enterprises reported having a policy and implementation of preventive and control measures. Implemented measures included health screening of their workers (97%), work arrangement, e.g., work from home (75.2%), area arrangement for work/social distancing (81.2%), ventilation improvement (59.4%), and provision of masks (100%).

Conclusions: Most of domestic COVID-19 infection were among working age. Approximately one-fifth of them got infection from work.   Occupations, especially working with or contact with foreigners and working in a high density of people, were high-risk factors. Several enterprises had implemented preventive and control measures. Prompt policy advocacy, knowledge-based recommendations and communication with target groups were essential.


Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 60 | PDF Downloads 56


Agius RM, Robertson JF, Kendrick D, Sewell HF, Stewart M, McKee M. 2020. Covid-19 in the workplace: Reporting guidance should reflect risks to a wide range of workers. BMJ. 370:m3577. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3577.
CDC. 2018. Global Health Protection and Security: Thailand Partnership Puts the Pieces Together for Emergency Response. Available: (Accessed December 11, 2020).
ICOH. 2020. Statement of the International Commission on Occupational Health to the Special Session of the Executive Board on the implementation of resolution WHA73.1 COVID-19 response, 5-6 October 2020. Available: (Accessed January 10, 2021).
ILO. 2020. ILO standards and COVID-19 (coronavirus): FAQ Key provisions of international labour standards relevant to the evolving COVID-19 outbreak. NORMES 29 May 2020-Version 2.1. Available:>genericdocument>wcms_739937 (Accessed January 10, 2021).
Kawakami T. 2009. Protecting Your Employees and Business from Pandemic Human Influenza: Action manual for small and medium-sized enterprises. Avian and Human Influenza in the Workplace (Thailand) Project. ILO Sub-regional Office for East Asia. Available:
Koh D. 2020. Occupational risks for COVID-19 infection. Occupational Medicine. 70:3-5.
Lan FY, Wei CF, Hsu YT, Christiani DC, Kales SN. 2020. Work-related COVID-19 transmission in six Asian countries/areas: A follow-up study. PLOS ONE. 15(5). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233588.
Marinaccio A, Boccuni F, Rondinone BM, Brusco A, D’Amario S, Iavicoli S. 2020. Occupational factors in the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy: compensation claims applications support establishing an occupational surveillance system. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 77:818-821. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2020-106844.
Molen HF, Kezic S, Visser S, Groene GD, Maas J, Wind AD, et al. 2020. Occupational COVID-19: What can be learned from notifications of occupational diseases? Occupational and Environmental Medicine. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2020-107121.
Mustard C. 2020. What research can do: Estimating the role of workplaces in COVID-19 transmissions. Newsletters/ At work/ Issue 101, Summer 2020: Institute for Work & Health, Toronto. Available: (Accessed December 11, 2020).
Pongpirul WA, Pongpirul K. 2020. Journey of a Thai Taxi Driver and Novel Coronavirus. N ENGL J MED 382;11 doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2001621.
Ramazzini C. 2020a. Technical Appendix: 24th Collegium Ramazzini Statement: Prevention of work-related infection in the COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Oncology and Environmental Health. Vol.1 Available:
Ramazzini C. 2020b. 25th Collegium Ramazzini Statement: Prevention of work-related COVID-19 infection in low-income and middle-income countries: need for a global response. European Journal of Oncology and Environmental Health. Vol.1. Available:
Sasaki N, Kuroda R, Tsuno K, Kawakami N. 2020a. Workplace responses to COVID-19 associated with mental health and work performance of employees in Japan. Journal of Occupational Health. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12134.
Sasaki N, Kuroda R, Tsuno K, Kawakami N. 2020b. Workplace responses to COVID-19 and their association with company size and industry in an early stage of the epidemic in Japan. Environmental and Occupational Health Practice. doi: 10.1539/eohp.2020-0007-OA.
TAT newsroom. 25 September 2020. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) situation in Thailand. Available: (Accessed December 11, 2020).
Waltenburg MA, Victoroff T, Rose CE, Butterfield M, Jervis RH, Fedak KM, et al. 2020. Update: COVID-19 Among Workers in Meat and Poultry Processing Facilities – United States, April-May 2020. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report July 10, 2020; Vol. 69/No. 27:887-892. Available:
WHO. 2020a. Considerations in adjusting public health and social measures in the context of COVID-19: interim guidance. Available: (Accessed December 11, 2020).
WHO. 2020b. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) Situation Report – 198. Available: (Accessed December 11, 2020).
WHO. 2020c. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Weekly epidemiological update. Available: (Accessed December 11, 2020).
WHO Thailand. 2020a. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) WHO Thailand Situation Report. Available: (Accessed December 11, 2020).
WHO Thailand. 2020b. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) 27 May 2020 WHO Thailand Situation Report. Available: (Accessed December 11, 2020).
Yanez ND, Weiss NS, Romand JA, Treggiari MM. 2020. COVID-19 mortality risk for older men and women. BMC Public Health. 20: 1742. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09826-8.