Laparotomic vs laparoscopic ovariectomy: comparing the two methods. The ovariectomy in the bitch in laparoscopic era

Giovanni Cassata, Vincenzo Davide Palumbo, Luca Cicero, Giuseppe Damiano, Antonio Maenza, Aldo Migliazzo, Gioacchino Di Paola, Domenico Vicari, Salvatore Fazzotta, Attilio Ignazio Lo Monte

Abstract


Background and aim: The aim of the present work is to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of ultrasound scalpel during laparoscopic ovariectomy in the bitch. Methods: Two groups of 10 subjects each, of different races and ages, were compared. In the first group, ovariectomy was performed laparoscopically, using harmonic scalpel to remove ovary. In the second group surgery was performed by means of classical laparotomy. Results: Pre-operative time was similar in both groups. Total operative time, from incision to skin suture, showed significant difference between the two groups, being laparoscopy faster than laparotomy. Partial operative time for bilateral oophorectomy resulted lower using open technique, but, considering each ovary, there was no significant difference in both groups. Conclusions: The use of harmonic scalpel to perform ovariectomy during laparoscopy is an effective time-sparing surgical approach compared to the already great practicality of laparotomy.


Keywords


oophorectomy, laparotomy, laparoscopy, harmonic scalpel

Full Text: PDF
Views:  Abstract - 67 PDF - 64

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Article Metrics Graph

Metrics powered by OpenJournalSystems.com

ISSN: 2531-6745